Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Philip Morris International Inc. (PM)
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Philip Morris International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 12, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$45.78Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 12:15 PM EDT
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
$185.88Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 12:15 PM EDT
Total return — MNST vs PM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMNST +243.4% (+13.1%/yr)PM +207.9% (+11.9%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window
MNST PM
MNST vs PM: by the numbers
- •PM is the larger company ($289.71B vs $89.54B market cap).
- •MNST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.08 vs 26.76 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PM converts more revenue to profit (25.56% vs 23.08% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 7.19% CAGR).
- •PM pays a dividend (3.16% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | PM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.08 | 26.76 |
| Forward P/E | 19.77 | 22.26 |
| P/S ratio | 4.88 | 6.84 |
| P/B ratio | 4.81 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.24 | 18.45 |
| FCF yield | 4.66% | 4.37% |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.55% | 67.51% |
| Operating margin | 29.16% | 37.75% |
| Net margin | 23.08% | 25.56% |
| ROE | 22.72% | -113.55% |
| ROIC | 21.74% | 25.56% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.16% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 80.88% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.36% | 7.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | 7.10% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.93% | 4.43% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.03% | 18.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or PM?
- MNST has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 21.08 and PM at 26.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or PM?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.36% CAGR versus PM at 7.19%.
- Does MNST or PM pay a bigger dividend?
- PM pays a dividend (3.16% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is MNST or PM more profitable?
- PM runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.08% versus PM at 25.56%.
- How have MNST and PM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 12.95% and PM delivered 11.97% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioPhilip Morris International P/E ratioPhilip Morris International dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEPhilip Morris International ROEMonster Beverage operating marginPhilip Morris International operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthPhilip Morris International revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowPhilip Morris International free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Philip Morris International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 12, 2026.