Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Philip Morris International Inc. (PM)
PM leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Philip Morris International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$96.38Consumer Defensive
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
$180.77Consumer Defensive
Total return — MNST vs PM
growth of $100 · last 18yMNST +2883.9%PM +266.0%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MNST PM
MNST vs PM: by the numbers
- •PM is the larger company ($281.74B vs $94.26B market cap).
- •PM trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.42 vs 46.56 P/E).
- •PM converts more revenue to profit (26.74% vs 23.11% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 7.34% CAGR).
- •PM pays a dividend (3.25% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MNST or PM?
Metric tally: MNST 4 · PM 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePM(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityPM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | PM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 46.56 | 25.42● |
| Forward P/E | 37.25 | 19.81● |
| P/S ratio | 10.83 | 6.81● |
| P/B ratio | 10.91 | — |
| PEG ratio | 1.31 | 0.36● |
| EV / EBITDA | 34.55 | 19.01● |
| FCF yield | 2.17% | 3.78%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47% | 67.30%● |
| Operating margin | 29.34% | 36.83%● |
| Net margin | 23.11% | 26.74%● |
| ROE | 23.28%● | -113.55% |
| ROIC | 21.74% | 25.56%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 3.25% |
| Payout ratio | — | 80.88% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96%● | 7.34% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95%● | 7.10% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53%● | 4.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.91% | 17.89%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MNST or PM?
- It depends on your goal. value: PM (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: PM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PM leads 11 to 4.
- Is MNST or PM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PM is cheaper: MNST trades at a 46.56 P/E and PM at 25.42.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or PM?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus PM at 7.34%.
- Does MNST or PM pay a bigger dividend?
- PM pays a dividend (3.25% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is MNST or PM more profitable?
- PM runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus PM at 26.74%.
- Which has been the better investment, MNST or PM?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 14.18% versus PM at 11.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioPhilip Morris International P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldPhilip Morris International dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEPhilip Morris International ROEMonster Beverage operating marginPhilip Morris International operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthPhilip Morris International revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowPhilip Morris International free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Philip Morris International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.