Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or PM?

MNST has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 21.17 and PM at 26.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MNST or PM?

Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.36% CAGR versus PM at 7.19%.

Does MNST or PM pay a bigger dividend?

PM pays a dividend (3.16% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is MNST or PM more profitable?

PM runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.08% versus PM at 25.56%.

How have MNST and PM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.05% and PM delivered 11.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Philip Morris International Inc. (PM)

A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Philip Morris International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MNST

Monster Beverage Corporation

$89.03B

$45.52Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 11:10 AM EDT

Philip Morris International Inc.

$289.34B

$185.64Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 11:10 AM EDT

Total return — MNST vs PM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MNST +244.8% (+13.2%/yr)PM +207.5% (+11.9%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window

MNST PM

MNST vs PM: by the numbers

•PM is the larger company ($289.34B vs $89.03B market cap).
•MNST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.17 vs 26.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PM converts more revenue to profit (25.56% vs 23.08% net margin).
•MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 7.19% CAGR).
•PM pays a dividend (3.16% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MNST	PM
P/E ratio	21.17	26.72
Forward P/E	19.86	22.23
P/S ratio	4.90	6.83
P/B ratio	4.83	N/A
EV / EBITDA	15.31	18.43
FCF yield	4.64%	4.38%

Profitability

Metric	MNST	PM
Gross margin	55.55%	67.51%
Operating margin	29.16%	37.75%
Net margin	23.08%	25.56%
ROE	22.72%	-113.55%
ROIC	21.74%	25.56%

Dividends

Metric	MNST	PM
Dividend yield	N/A	3.16%
Payout ratio	N/A	80.88%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MNST	PM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.36%	7.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.95%	7.10%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.93%	4.43%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.11%	18.68%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or PM?: MNST has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 21.17 and PM at 26.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MNST or PM?: Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.36% CAGR versus PM at 7.19%.
Does MNST or PM pay a bigger dividend?: PM pays a dividend (3.16% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is MNST or PM more profitable?: PM runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.08% versus PM at 25.56%.
How have MNST and PM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.05% and PM delivered 11.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MNST analysis Full PM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Monster Beverage P/E ratio Philip Morris International P/E ratio Philip Morris International dividend yield Monster Beverage ROE Philip Morris International ROE Monster Beverage operating margin Philip Morris International operating margin Monster Beverage revenue growth Philip Morris International revenue growth Monster Beverage free cash flow Philip Morris International free cash flow

Monster Beverage & Philip Morris International appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 11, 2026.