Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE)
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Pfizer Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: MNST is classified in Consumer Defensive; PFE is classified in Healthcare. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$97.74Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$25.25HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT
Total return — MNST vs PFE
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yMNST +457491.3%PFE +543.3%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MNST PFE
MNST vs PFE: by the numbers
- •PFE is the larger company ($143.91B vs $95.59B market cap).
- •PFE trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.83 vs 46.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 11.83% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 8.22% CAGR).
- •PFE pays a dividend (6.97% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | PFE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 46.05 | 18.83 |
| Forward P/E | 41.41 | 8.38 |
| P/S ratio | 10.71 | 2.23 |
| P/B ratio | 10.80 | 1.57 |
| PEG ratio | 1.31 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 34.17 | 9.72 |
| FCF yield | 2.20% | 6.71% |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | PFE |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47% | 69.35% |
| Operating margin | 29.34% | 23.45% |
| Net margin | 23.11% | 11.83% |
| ROE | 23.28% | 8.31% |
| ROIC | 21.74% | 8.84% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | PFE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 6.97% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 126.47% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | PFE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96% | 8.22% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | -3.78% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53% | -3.79% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.91% | -5.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or PFE?
- PFE has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 46.05 and PFE at 18.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or PFE?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus PFE at 8.22%.
- Does MNST or PFE pay a bigger dividend?
- PFE pays a dividend (6.97% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is MNST or PFE more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus PFE at 11.83%.
- How have MNST and PFE total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.77% and PFE delivered 1.55% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioPfizer P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldPfizer dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEPfizer ROEMonster Beverage operating marginPfizer operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthPfizer revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowPfizer free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Pfizer appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.