Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE)
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Pfizer Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: MNST is classified in Consumer Defensive; PFE is classified in Healthcare. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$44.20Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.72HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 4:01 PM EDT
Total return — MNST vs PFE
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMNST +255.7% (+13.5%/yr)PFE +37.0% (+3.2%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window
MNST PFE
MNST vs PFE: by the numbers
- •PFE is the larger company ($157.99B vs $86.46B market cap).
- •PFE trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (36.63 vs 40.74 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 6.81% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 6.29% CAGR).
- •PFE pays a dividend (6.20% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | PFE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.74 | 36.63 |
| Forward P/E | 38.09 | 9.32 |
| P/S ratio | 9.38 | 2.48 |
| P/B ratio | 9.23 | 1.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.15 | 10.15 |
| FCF yield | 2.43% | 6.95% |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | PFE |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.55% | 71.32% |
| Operating margin | 29.16% | 25.08% |
| Net margin | 23.08% | 6.81% |
| ROE | 22.72% | 5.09% |
| ROIC | 21.32% | 9.33% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | PFE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 6.20% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 227.27% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | PFE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.36% | 6.29% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | -3.78% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.93% | -3.11% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.59% | -4.53% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or PFE?
- PFE has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 40.74 and PFE at 36.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or PFE?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.36% CAGR versus PFE at 6.29%.
- Does MNST or PFE pay a bigger dividend?
- PFE pays a dividend (6.20% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is MNST or PFE more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.08% versus PFE at 6.81%.
- How have MNST and PFE total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.43% and PFE delivered 3.15% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioPfizer P/E ratioPfizer dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEPfizer ROEMonster Beverage operating marginPfizer operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthPfizer revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowPfizer free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Pfizer appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.