Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: MNST is classified in Consumer Defensive; NMS is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$97.74Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
$12.08Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MNST vs NMS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 12yMNST +531.7%NMS +45.7%MNST compounded faster
MNST NMS
MNST vs NMS: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($95.59B vs $77M market cap).
- •NMS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.31 vs 46.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NMS converts more revenue to profit (87.52% vs 23.11% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 9.23% CAGR).
- •NMS pays a dividend (6.68% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 46.05 | 11.31 |
| Forward P/E | 41.41 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 10.71 | 9.99 |
| P/B ratio | 10.80 | 1.01 |
| PEG ratio | 1.31 | 2.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 34.17 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 2.20% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47% | -4.36% |
| Operating margin | 29.34% | -12.54% |
| Net margin | 23.11% | 87.52% |
| ROE | 23.28% | 8.85% |
| ROIC | 21.74% | -0.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 6.68% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96% | 9.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | -22.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.91% | 0.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or NMS?
- NMS has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 46.05 and NMS at 11.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or NMS?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus NMS at 9.23%.
- Does MNST or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
- NMS pays a dividend (6.68% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is MNST or NMS more profitable?
- NMS runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus NMS at 87.52%.
- How have MNST and NMS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.77% and NMS delivered 1.66% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROENuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEMonster Beverage operating marginNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.