Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)

A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: MNST is classified in Consumer Defensive; NMS is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnMNST vs NMS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 12y
MNST +531.7%NMS +45.7%MNST compounded faster
200400600Start $100201620182020202220242026$632$146
MNST NMS

MNST vs NMS: by the numbers

  • MNST is the larger company ($95.59B vs $77M market cap).
  • NMS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.31 vs 46.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • NMS converts more revenue to profit (87.52% vs 23.11% net margin).
  • MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 9.23% CAGR).
  • NMS pays a dividend (6.68% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricMNSTNMS
P/E ratio46.0511.31
Forward P/E41.41N/A
P/S ratio10.719.99
P/B ratio10.801.01
PEG ratio1.312.28
EV / EBITDA34.17N/A
FCF yield2.20%N/A

Profitability

MetricMNSTNMS
Gross margin55.47%-4.36%
Operating margin29.34%-12.54%
Net margin23.11%87.52%
ROE23.28%8.85%
ROIC21.74%-0.21%

Dividends

MetricMNSTNMS
Dividend yieldN/A6.68%

Growth (annualized)

MetricMNSTNMS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)12.96%9.23%
EPS CAGR (5Y)7.95%-22.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)10.53%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.91%0.62%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or NMS?
NMS has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 46.05 and NMS at 11.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MNST or NMS?
Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus NMS at 9.23%.
Does MNST or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
NMS pays a dividend (6.68% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is MNST or NMS more profitable?
NMS runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus NMS at 87.52%.
How have MNST and NMS total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.77% and NMS delivered 1.66% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.