Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Altria Group, Inc. (MO)
MO leads on 11 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Altria Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
$71.94Consumer Defensive
Total return — MNST vs MO
growth of $100 · last 30yMNST +509143.5%MO +106.8%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MNST MO
MNST vs MO: by the numbers
- •MO is the larger company ($120.13B vs $90.79B market cap).
- •MO trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.05 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MO converts more revenue to profit (36.91% vs 23.11% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 1.08% CAGR).
- •MO pays a dividend (5.84% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MNST or MO?
Metric tally: MNST 3 · MO 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMO(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMO(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | MO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 44.85 | 15.05● |
| Forward P/E | 35.95 | 12.23● |
| P/S ratio | 10.43 | 5.52● |
| P/B ratio | 10.51 | — |
| PEG ratio | 1.31 | 1.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.31 | 11.93● |
| FCF yield | 2.26% | 7.16%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47% | 67.84%● |
| Operating margin | 29.34% | 50.73%● |
| Net margin | 23.11% | 36.91%● |
| ROE | 23.28%● | -198.37% |
| ROIC | 21.74% | 42.95%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 5.84% |
| Payout ratio | — | 102.19% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96%● | 1.08% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | 11.36%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53%● | 1.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.70% | 16.42%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MNST or MO?
- It depends on your goal. value: MO (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MO leads 11 to 3.
- Is MNST or MO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MO is cheaper: MNST trades at a 44.85 P/E and MO at 15.05.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or MO?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus MO at 1.08%.
- Does MNST or MO pay a bigger dividend?
- MO pays a dividend (5.84% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is MNST or MO more profitable?
- MO runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus MO at 36.91%.
- Which has been the better investment, MNST or MO?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.75% versus MO at 7.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioAltria P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldAltria dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEAltria ROEMonster Beverage operating marginAltria operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthAltria revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowAltria free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Altria appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.