Which has the lower trailing P/E, MMM or VRT?

MMM has the lower trailing P/E: MMM trades at 31.61 and VRT at 50.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MMM or VRT?

Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — MMM at a -6.23% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.

Does MMM or VRT pay a bigger dividend?

MMM yields 1.70% and VRT yields 0.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MMM or VRT more profitable?

VRT runs the higher net margin — MMM at 11.90% versus VRT at 15.09%.

How have MMM and VRT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, MMM delivered 5.16% and VRT delivered 51.45% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

3M Company (MMM) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

A side-by-side comparison of 3M Company and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MMM

3M Company

$91.78B

$177.97IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

VRT

Vertiv Holdings Co

$85.67B

$223.04IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MMM vs VRT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

MMM +35.2%VRT +2176.2%VRT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MMM VRT

MMM vs VRT: by the numbers

•MMM is the larger company ($91.78B vs $85.67B market cap).
•MMM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.61 vs 50.46 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•VRT converts more revenue to profit (15.09% vs 11.90% net margin).
•VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.93% vs -6.23% CAGR).
•MMM pays the higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.10%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MMM	VRT
P/E ratio	31.61	50.46
Forward P/E	20.01	34.38
P/S ratio	3.73	7.63
P/B ratio	31.80	18.41
PEG ratio	N/A	0.28
EV / EBITDA	17.72	33.50
FCF yield	4.24%	2.50%

Profitability

Metric	MMM	VRT
Gross margin	39.40%	37.52%
Operating margin	19.01%	19.12%
Net margin	11.90%	15.09%
ROE	101.52%	36.40%
ROIC	11.53%	18.55%

Dividends

Metric	MMM	VRT
Dividend yield	1.70%	0.10%
Payout ratio	50.00%	6.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MMM	VRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-6.23%	18.93%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-8.53%	79.41%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-10.85%	41.86%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.13%	51.45%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MMM or VRT?: MMM has the lower trailing P/E: MMM trades at 31.61 and VRT at 50.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MMM or VRT?: Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — MMM at a -6.23% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.
Does MMM or VRT pay a bigger dividend?: MMM yields 1.70% and VRT yields 0.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MMM or VRT more profitable?: VRT runs the higher net margin — MMM at 11.90% versus VRT at 15.09%.
How have MMM and VRT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, MMM delivered 5.16% and VRT delivered 51.45% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MMM analysis Full VRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

3M P/E ratio Vertiv P/E ratio 3M dividend yield Vertiv dividend yield 3M ROE Vertiv ROE 3M operating margin Vertiv operating margin 3M revenue growth Vertiv revenue growth 3M free cash flow Vertiv free cash flow

3M & Vertiv appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.