3M Company (MMM) vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK)
A side-by-side comparison of 3M Company and Verisk Analytics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: MMM is classified in Industrials; VRSK is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
MMM
3M Company
$182.49IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$212.26TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MMM vs VRSK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 17yMMM +359.0%VRSK +698.7%VRSK compounded faster
MMM VRSK
MMM vs VRSK: by the numbers
- •MMM is the larger company ($94.11B vs $27.81B market cap).
- •VRSK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.46 vs 31.66 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •VRSK converts more revenue to profit (29.34% vs 11.90% net margin).
- •VRSK grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.92% vs -6.23% CAGR).
- •MMM pays the higher dividend yield (1.69% vs 0.92%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MMM | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 31.66 | 31.46 |
| Forward P/E | 20.04 | 26.96 |
| P/S ratio | 3.73 | 9.01 |
| P/B ratio | 31.85 | 92.99 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 3.81 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.74 | 18.83 |
| FCF yield | 4.24% | 4.03% |
Profitability
| Metric | MMM | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.40% | 67.44% |
| Operating margin | 19.01% | 44.87% |
| Net margin | 11.90% | 29.34% |
| ROE | 101.52% | 293.95% |
| ROIC | 11.53% | 19.56% |
Dividends
| Metric | MMM | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.69% | 0.92% |
| Payout ratio | 50.00% | 29.19% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MMM | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -6.23% | 1.92% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -8.53% | 8.25% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -10.85% | 4.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.86% | 2.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MMM or VRSK?
- VRSK has the lower trailing P/E: MMM trades at 31.66 and VRSK at 31.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MMM or VRSK?
- Over the past five years, VRSK grew revenue faster — MMM at a -6.23% CAGR versus VRSK at 1.92%.
- Does MMM or VRSK pay a bigger dividend?
- MMM yields 1.69% and VRSK yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MMM or VRSK more profitable?
- VRSK runs the higher net margin — MMM at 11.90% versus VRSK at 29.34%.
- How have MMM and VRSK total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MMM delivered 5.55% and VRSK delivered 9.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
3M P/E ratioVerisk Analytics P/E ratio3M dividend yieldVerisk Analytics dividend yield3M ROEVerisk Analytics ROE3M operating marginVerisk Analytics operating margin3M revenue growthVerisk Analytics revenue growth3M free cash flowVerisk Analytics free cash flow
3M & Verisk Analytics appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.