3M Company (MMM) vs Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)
MMM leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of 3M Company and Quanta Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MMM
3M Company
$159.34IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
$632.56IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MMM vs PWR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yMMM +842.7%PWR +8501.2%PWR compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MMM PWR
MMM vs PWR: by the numbers
- •PWR is the larger company ($94.92B vs $83.11B market cap).
- •MMM trades at the lower earnings multiple (30.66 vs 86.77 P/E).
- •MMM converts more revenue to profit (11.14% vs 3.72% net margin).
- •PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.91% vs -5.36% CAGR).
- •MMM pays the higher dividend yield (1.90% vs 0.07%).
Which is better, MMM or PWR?
Metric tally: MMM 10 · PWR 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMMM(lower P/E)
GrowthPWR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMM(higher dividend yield)
QualityMMM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MMM | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 30.66● | 86.77 |
| Forward P/E | 18.23● | 45.17 |
| P/S ratio | 3.39 | 3.21● |
| P/B ratio | 25.98 | 10.64● |
| PEG ratio | — | 5.33 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.98● | 43.03 |
| FCF yield | 2.43%● | 1.75% |
Profitability
| Metric | MMM | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.51%● | 13.59% |
| Operating margin | 19.60%● | 5.76% |
| Net margin | 11.14%● | 3.72% |
| ROE | 85.41%● | 12.33% |
| ROIC | 11.53%● | 7.07% |
Dividends
| Metric | MMM | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.90%● | 0.07% |
| Payout ratio | 50.00% | 6.26% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MMM | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -5.36% | 21.91%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -8.53% | 16.88%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -21.95% | 17.91%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.53% | 48.50%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MMM or PWR?
- It depends on your goal. value: MMM (lower P/E); growth: PWR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMM (higher dividend yield); quality: MMM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MMM leads 10 to 6.
- Is MMM or PWR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MMM is cheaper: MMM trades at a 30.66 P/E and PWR at 86.77.
- Which has grown faster, MMM or PWR?
- Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — MMM at a -5.36% CAGR versus PWR at 21.91%.
- Does MMM or PWR pay a bigger dividend?
- MMM yields 1.90% and PWR yields 0.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MMM or PWR more profitable?
- MMM runs the higher net margin — MMM at 11.14% versus PWR at 3.72%.
- Which has been the better investment, MMM or PWR?
- Over the past 10-year, PWR delivered the higher annualized total return — MMM at 3.82% versus PWR at 38.12%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
3M P/E ratioQuanta Services P/E ratio3M dividend yieldQuanta Services dividend yield3M ROEQuanta Services ROE3M operating marginQuanta Services operating margin3M revenue growthQuanta Services revenue growth3M free cash flowQuanta Services free cash flow
3M & Quanta Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.