Which has the lower trailing P/E, MMM or PWR?

MMM has the lower trailing P/E: MMM trades at 29.97 and PWR at 69.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MMM or PWR?

Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — MMM at a -6.23% CAGR versus PWR at 23.02%.

Does MMM or PWR pay a bigger dividend?

MMM yields 1.82% and PWR yields 0.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MMM or PWR more profitable?

MMM runs the higher net margin — MMM at 11.90% versus PWR at 4.08%.

How have MMM and PWR total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MMM delivered 4.45% and PWR delivered 37.31% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

3M Company (MMM) vs Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)

A side-by-side comparison of 3M Company and Quanta Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MMM

3M Company

$86.81B

$168.32IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

PWR

Quanta Services, Inc.

$93.22B

$620.06IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MMM vs PWR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MMM +55.0% (+4.5%/yr)PWR +2294.8% (+37.4%/yr)PWR compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MMM PWR

MMM vs PWR: by the numbers

•PWR is the larger company ($93.22B vs $86.81B market cap).
•MMM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.97 vs 69.96 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MMM converts more revenue to profit (11.90% vs 4.08% net margin).
•PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.02% vs -6.23% CAGR).
•MMM pays the higher dividend yield (1.82% vs 0.07%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MMM	PWR
P/E ratio	29.97	69.96
Forward P/E	18.87	36.52
P/S ratio	3.54	2.84
P/B ratio	30.16	9.66
EV / EBITDA	17.88	33.10
FCF yield	4.48%	2.57%

Profitability

Metric	MMM	PWR
Gross margin	39.40%	14.42%
Operating margin	19.01%	6.20%
Net margin	11.90%	4.08%
ROE	101.52%	13.88%
ROIC	14.64%	8.49%

Dividends

Metric	MMM	PWR
Dividend yield	1.82%	0.07%
Payout ratio	50.83%	6.26%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MMM	PWR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-6.23%	23.02%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-8.53%	16.88%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-10.85%	42.82%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.30%	40.11%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MMM or PWR?: MMM has the lower trailing P/E: MMM trades at 29.97 and PWR at 69.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MMM or PWR?: Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — MMM at a -6.23% CAGR versus PWR at 23.02%.
Does MMM or PWR pay a bigger dividend?: MMM yields 1.82% and PWR yields 0.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MMM or PWR more profitable?: MMM runs the higher net margin — MMM at 11.90% versus PWR at 4.08%.
How have MMM and PWR total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MMM delivered 4.45% and PWR delivered 37.31% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MMM analysis Full PWR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

3M P/E ratio Quanta Services P/E ratio 3M dividend yield Quanta Services dividend yield 3M ROE Quanta Services ROE 3M operating margin Quanta Services operating margin 3M revenue growth Quanta Services revenue growth 3M free cash flow Quanta Services free cash flow

3M & Quanta Services appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.