Which has the lower trailing P/E, MLM or RS?

MLM has the lower trailing P/E: MLM trades at 11.85 and RS at 23.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MLM or RS?

Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — MLM at a 6.59% CAGR versus RS at 8.57%.

Does MLM or RS pay a bigger dividend?

MLM yields 0.69% and RS yields 1.24% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MLM or RS more profitable?

MLM runs the higher net margin — MLM at 36.81% versus RS at 5.66%.

How have MLM and RS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MLM delivered 11.23% and RS delivered 21.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) vs Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS)

A side-by-side comparison of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MLM

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

$28.98B

$482.49Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

$20.44B

$400.31Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MLM vs RS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MLM +203.2% (+11.7%/yr)RS +588.2% (+21.3%/yr)RS compounded faster over this window

MLM RS

MLM vs RS: by the numbers

•MLM is the larger company ($28.98B vs $20.44B market cap).
•MLM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.85 vs 23.29 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MLM converts more revenue to profit (36.81% vs 5.66% net margin).
•RS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.57% vs 6.59% CAGR).
•RS pays the higher dividend yield (1.24% vs 0.69%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MLM	RS
P/E ratio	11.85	23.29
Forward P/E	26.79	17.00
PEG ratio	1.16	1.17
P/S ratio	4.33	1.29
P/B ratio	2.51	2.76
EV / EBITDA	16.60	14.57
FCF yield	2.79%	2.64%

Profitability

Metric	MLM	RS
Gross margin	28.23%	26.89%
Operating margin	21.09%	7.88%
Net margin	36.81%	5.66%
ROE	21.32%	12.09%
ROIC	5.50%	9.36%

Dividends

Metric	MLM	RS
Dividend yield	0.69%	1.24%
Payout ratio	8.18%	28.80%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MLM	RS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.59%	8.57%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	10.27%	19.64%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.35%	-1.79%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.04%	24.76%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MLM or RS?: MLM has the lower trailing P/E: MLM trades at 11.85 and RS at 23.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MLM or RS?: Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — MLM at a 6.59% CAGR versus RS at 8.57%.
Does MLM or RS pay a bigger dividend?: MLM yields 0.69% and RS yields 1.24% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MLM or RS more profitable?: MLM runs the higher net margin — MLM at 36.81% versus RS at 5.66%.
How have MLM and RS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MLM delivered 11.23% and RS delivered 21.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MLM analysis Full RS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Martin Marietta Materials P/E ratio Reliance Steel & Aluminum P/E ratio Martin Marietta Materials dividend yield Reliance Steel & Aluminum dividend yield Martin Marietta Materials ROE Reliance Steel & Aluminum ROE Martin Marietta Materials operating margin Reliance Steel & Aluminum operating margin Martin Marietta Materials revenue growth Reliance Steel & Aluminum revenue growth Martin Marietta Materials free cash flow Reliance Steel & Aluminum free cash flow

Martin Marietta Materials & Reliance Steel & Aluminum appear in these rankings

Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 4, 2026.