MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) vs XPEL, Inc. (XPEL)
A side-by-side comparison of MillerKnoll, Inc. and XPEL, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MLKN
MillerKnoll, Inc.
$20.83Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:20 PM EDT
XPEL
XPEL, Inc.
$45.27Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:20 PM EDT
Total return — MLKN vs XPEL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMLKN -1.6% (-0.2%/yr)XPEL +3232.6% (+42.0%/yr)XPEL compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MLKN XPEL
MLKN vs XPEL: by the numbers
- •MLKN is the larger company ($1.42B vs $1.25B market cap).
- •MLKN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.77 vs 22.98 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •XPEL converts more revenue to profit (10.77% vs 2.57% net margin).
- •XPEL grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.73% vs -0.67% CAGR).
- •MLKN pays a dividend (3.57% yield), while XPEL has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MLKN | XPEL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.77 | 22.98 |
| Forward P/E | 10.32 | 20.58 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 1.00 |
| P/S ratio | 0.37 | 2.46 |
| P/B ratio | 1.05 | 4.08 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.27 | 15.27 |
| FCF yield | 8.14% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | MLKN | XPEL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.57% | 42.90% |
| Operating margin | 5.51% | 13.47% |
| Net margin | 2.57% | 10.77% |
| ROE | 7.22% | 17.88% |
| ROIC | 4.77% | 14.04% |
Dividends
| Metric | MLKN | XPEL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.57% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 53.19% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MLKN | XPEL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.67% | 18.73% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 22.90% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.42% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.42% | -10.19% |
Some values include inputs from SEC filing.
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MLKN or XPEL?
- MLKN has the lower trailing P/E: MLKN trades at 14.77 and XPEL at 22.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MLKN or XPEL?
- Over the past five years, XPEL grew revenue faster — MLKN at a -0.67% CAGR versus XPEL at 18.73%.
- Does MLKN or XPEL pay a bigger dividend?
- MLKN pays a dividend (3.57% yield), while XPEL has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is MLKN or XPEL more profitable?
- XPEL runs the higher net margin — MLKN at 2.57% versus XPEL at 10.77%.
- How have MLKN and XPEL total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MLKN delivered -0.58% and XPEL delivered 41.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
MillerKnoll P/E ratioXPEL P/E ratioMillerKnoll dividend yieldMillerKnoll ROEXPEL ROEMillerKnoll operating marginXPEL operating marginMillerKnoll revenue growthXPEL revenue growthMillerKnoll free cash flowXPEL free cash flow
MillerKnoll & XPEL appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.