MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) vs TriMas Corporation (TRS)
A side-by-side comparison of MillerKnoll, Inc. and TriMas Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MLKN
MillerKnoll, Inc.
$20.72Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TRS
TriMas Corporation
$38.97Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MLKN vs TRS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMLKN -5.7% (-0.6%/yr)TRS +120.7% (+8.2%/yr)TRS compounded faster over this window
MLKN TRS
MLKN vs TRS: by the numbers
- •MLKN is the larger company ($1.41B vs $1.40B market cap).
- •TRS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (1.62 vs 14.70 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •TRS converts more revenue to profit (117.92% vs 2.57% net margin).
- •Both shrank revenue over the past five years; MLKN's decline was smaller (-0.67% vs -1.15% CAGR).
- •MLKN pays the higher dividend yield (3.57% vs 0.41%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MLKN | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.70 | 1.62 |
| Forward P/E | 10.27 | 23.59 |
| P/S ratio | 0.37 | 1.82 |
| P/B ratio | 1.04 | 0.97 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.26 | 4.28 |
| FCF yield | 8.18% | 11.76% |
Profitability
| Metric | MLKN | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.57% | 21.59% |
| Operating margin | 5.51% | 5.43% |
| Net margin | 2.57% | 117.92% |
| ROE | 7.22% | 62.75% |
| ROIC | 4.77% | 2.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | MLKN | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.57% | 0.41% |
| Payout ratio | 53.19% | 0.67% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MLKN | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.67% | -1.15% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.42% | -4.49% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.42% | 4.11% |
Some values include inputs from SEC filing.
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MLKN or TRS?
- TRS has the lower trailing P/E: MLKN trades at 14.70 and TRS at 1.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MLKN or TRS?
- Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with MLKN's decline the smaller — MLKN at a -0.67% CAGR versus TRS at -1.15%.
- Does MLKN or TRS pay a bigger dividend?
- MLKN yields 3.57% and TRS yields 0.41% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MLKN or TRS more profitable?
- TRS runs the higher net margin — MLKN at 2.57% versus TRS at 117.92%.
- How have MLKN and TRS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MLKN delivered -0.58% and TRS delivered 8.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
MillerKnoll P/E ratioTriMas P/E ratioMillerKnoll dividend yieldTriMas dividend yieldMillerKnoll ROETriMas ROEMillerKnoll operating marginTriMas operating marginMillerKnoll revenue growthTriMas revenue growthMillerKnoll free cash flowTriMas free cash flow
MillerKnoll & TriMas appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.