Which has grown faster, MKTX or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — MKTX at a 4.21% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.

Does MKTX or WULF pay a bigger dividend?

MKTX pays a dividend (1.90% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is MKTX or WULF more profitable?

MKTX runs the higher net margin — MKTX at 35.23% versus WULF at -1179.94%.

How have MKTX and WULF total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MKTX delivered 0.77% and WULF delivered 6.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

A side-by-side comparison of MarketAxess Holdings Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MKTX

MarketAxess Holdings Inc.

$5.72B

$162.46Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WULF

TeraWulf Inc.

$8.17B

$16.49Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MKTX vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MKTX +5.8% (+0.6%/yr)WULF +85.7% (+6.4%/yr)WULF compounded faster over this window

MKTX WULF

MKTX vs WULF: by the numbers

•WULF is the larger company ($8.17B vs $5.72B market cap).
•MKTX is profitable (35.23% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-1179.94%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (73.75% vs 4.21% CAGR).
•MKTX pays a dividend (1.90% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MKTX	WULF
P/E ratio	19.16	N/A
Forward P/E	20.45	N/A
P/S ratio	6.58	48.49
P/B ratio	4.62	54.38

Profitability

Metric	MKTX	WULF
Gross margin	67.52%	50.93%
Operating margin	40.51%	-101.10%
Net margin	35.23%	-1179.94%
ROE	24.73%	-1323.42%

Dividends

Metric	MKTX	WULF
Dividend yield	1.90%	N/A
Payout ratio	46.25%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MKTX	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.21%	73.75%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.62%	-27.04%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-18.58%	-8.33%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, MKTX or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — MKTX at a 4.21% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.
Does MKTX or WULF pay a bigger dividend?: MKTX pays a dividend (1.90% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is MKTX or WULF more profitable?: MKTX runs the higher net margin — MKTX at 35.23% versus WULF at -1179.94%.
How have MKTX and WULF total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MKTX delivered 0.77% and WULF delivered 6.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MKTX analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

MarketAxess P/E ratio MarketAxess dividend yield MarketAxess ROE TeraWulf ROE MarketAxess operating margin TeraWulf operating margin MarketAxess revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth

MarketAxess & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.