McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN)
MKC leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Tyson Foods, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$48.35Consumer Defensive
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
$57.81Consumer Defensive
Total return — MKC vs TSN
growth of $100 · last 30yMKC +779.9%TSN +219.7%MKC compounded faster
MKC TSN
MKC vs TSN: by the numbers
- •TSN is the larger company ($20.58B vs $13.00B market cap).
- •MKC trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.04 vs 44.81 P/E).
- •MKC converts more revenue to profit (22.05% vs 0.81% net margin).
- •TSN grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.15% vs 4.15% CAGR).
- •MKC pays the higher dividend yield (3.85% vs 3.51%).
Which is better, MKC or TSN?
Metric tally: MKC 10 · TSN 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMKC(lower P/E)
GrowthTSN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMKC(higher dividend yield)
QualityMKC(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MKC | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.04● | 44.81 |
| Forward P/E | 14.57 | 14.30 |
| P/S ratio | 1.76 | 0.37● |
| P/B ratio | 1.86 | 1.13● |
| PEG ratio | 8.21 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.83 | 10.98● |
| FCF yield | 8.90%● | 6.00% |
Profitability
| Metric | MKC | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.62%● | 6.55% |
| Operating margin | 15.34%● | 2.30% |
| Net margin | 22.05%● | 0.81% |
| ROE | 23.28%● | 2.50% |
| ROIC | 7.93%● | 3.05% |
Dividends
| Metric | MKC | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.85%● | 3.51% |
| Payout ratio | 63.27% | 149.26% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MKC | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.15% | 5.15%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.98%● | -20.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.78%● | -16.69% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.19% | -1.89%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MKC or TSN?
- It depends on your goal. value: MKC (lower P/E); growth: TSN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MKC (higher dividend yield); quality: MKC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MKC leads 10 to 5.
- Is MKC or TSN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MKC is cheaper: MKC trades at a 8.04 P/E and TSN at 44.81.
- Which has grown faster, MKC or TSN?
- Over the past five years, TSN grew revenue faster — MKC at a 4.15% CAGR versus TSN at 5.15%.
- Does MKC or TSN pay a bigger dividend?
- MKC yields 3.85% and TSN yields 3.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MKC or TSN more profitable?
- MKC runs the higher net margin — MKC at 22.05% versus TSN at 0.81%.
- Which has been the better investment, MKC or TSN?
- Over the past 10-year, TSN delivered the higher annualized total return — MKC at 1.43% versus TSN at 1.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
McCormick & P/E ratioTyson Foods P/E ratioMcCormick & dividend yieldTyson Foods dividend yieldMcCormick & ROETyson Foods ROEMcCormick & operating marginTyson Foods operating marginMcCormick & revenue growthTyson Foods revenue growthMcCormick & free cash flowTyson Foods free cash flow
McCormick & & Tyson Foods appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.