McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP)
TAP leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Molson Coors Beverage Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$48.95Consumer Defensive
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company
$41.58Consumer Defensive
Total return — MKC vs TAP
growth of $100 · last 30yMKC +790.0%TAP +368.2%MKC compounded faster
MKC TAP
MKC vs TAP: by the numbers
- •MKC is the larger company ($13.16B vs $7.80B market cap).
- •MKC is profitable (23.12% net margin) while TAP runs a net loss (-18.85%).
- •MKC grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.90% vs 3.44% CAGR).
- •TAP pays the higher dividend yield (4.57% vs 3.80%).
Which is better, MKC or TAP?
Metric tally: MKC 6 · TAP 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthMKC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTAP(higher dividend yield)
QualityMKC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MKC | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.02 | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.76 | 8.37● |
| P/S ratio | 1.86 | 0.70● |
| P/B ratio | 1.89 | 0.78● |
| PEG ratio | 8.19 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.96 | — |
| FCF yield | 6.21% | 14.81%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MKC | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.94% | 37.83% |
| Operating margin | 15.51%● | -20.28% |
| Net margin | 23.12%● | -18.85% |
| ROE | 23.54%● | -20.98% |
| ROIC | 7.93%● | -10.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | MKC | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | 4.57%● |
| Payout ratio | 63.27% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MKC | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.90%● | 3.44% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.98% | 36.85%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.35%● | 1.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.28% | -4.04%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MKC or TAP?
- It depends on your goal. growth: MKC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TAP (higher dividend yield); quality: MKC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TAP leads 7 to 6.
- Which has grown faster, MKC or TAP?
- Over the past five years, MKC grew revenue faster — MKC at a 3.90% CAGR versus TAP at 3.44%.
- Does MKC or TAP pay a bigger dividend?
- MKC yields 3.80% and TAP yields 4.57% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MKC or TAP more profitable?
- MKC runs the higher net margin — MKC at 23.12% versus TAP at -18.85%.
- Which has been the better investment, MKC or TAP?
- Over the past 10-year, MKC delivered the higher annualized total return — MKC at 1.73% versus TAP at -6.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
McCormick & P/E ratioMolson Coors Beverage P/E ratioMcCormick & dividend yieldMolson Coors Beverage dividend yieldMcCormick & ROEMolson Coors Beverage ROEMcCormick & operating marginMolson Coors Beverage operating marginMcCormick & revenue growthMolson Coors Beverage revenue growthMcCormick & free cash flowMolson Coors Beverage free cash flow
McCormick & & Molson Coors Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.