McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM)
MKC leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and The J. M. Smucker Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$48.95Consumer Defensive
SJM
The J. M. Smucker Company
$116.49Consumer Defensive
Total return — MKC vs SJM
growth of $100 · last 30yMKC +780.4%SJM +480.7%MKC compounded faster
MKC SJM
MKC vs SJM: by the numbers
- •MKC is the larger company ($13.16B vs $12.42B market cap).
- •MKC is profitable (23.12% net margin) while SJM runs a net loss (-1.53%).
- •MKC grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.90% vs 2.49% CAGR).
- •MKC pays the higher dividend yield (3.80% vs 3.78%).
Which is better, MKC or SJM?
Metric tally: MKC 9 · SJM 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthMKC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMKC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MKC | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.02 | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.75 | 11.69● |
| P/S ratio | 1.86 | 1.37● |
| P/B ratio | 1.89● | 2.24 |
| PEG ratio | 8.19 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.63● | 36.76 |
| FCF yield | 6.45% | 9.30%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MKC | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.94%● | 33.53% |
| Operating margin | 15.51%● | 3.98% |
| Net margin | 23.12%● | -1.53% |
| ROE | 23.54%● | -2.50% |
| ROIC | 7.93%● | 2.53% |
Dividends
| Metric | MKC | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | 3.78% |
| Payout ratio | 63.27% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MKC | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.90%● | 2.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.98% | 9.57%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.15%● | -1.68% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.28% | 0.30%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MKC or SJM?
- It depends on your goal. growth: MKC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MKC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MKC leads 9 to 5.
- Which has grown faster, MKC or SJM?
- Over the past five years, MKC grew revenue faster — MKC at a 3.90% CAGR versus SJM at 2.49%.
- Does MKC or SJM pay a bigger dividend?
- MKC yields 3.80% and SJM yields 3.78% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MKC or SJM more profitable?
- MKC runs the higher net margin — MKC at 23.12% versus SJM at -1.53%.
- Which has been the better investment, MKC or SJM?
- Over the past 10-year, MKC delivered the higher annualized total return — MKC at 1.73% versus SJM at 1.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
McCormick & P/E ratioJ. M. Smucker P/E ratioMcCormick & dividend yieldJ. M. Smucker dividend yieldMcCormick & ROEJ. M. Smucker ROEMcCormick & operating marginJ. M. Smucker operating marginMcCormick & revenue growthJ. M. Smucker revenue growthMcCormick & free cash flowJ. M. Smucker free cash flow
McCormick & & J. M. Smucker appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.