McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD)
MKC and SFD are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Smithfield Foods, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$52.24Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
$25.90Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — MKC vs SFD
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yMKC -27.1%SFD +35.3%SFD compounded faster
MKC SFD
MKC vs SFD: by the numbers
- •MKC is the larger company ($14.04B vs $10.19B market cap).
- •MKC trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.69 vs 10.12 P/E).
- •MKC converts more revenue to profit (22.05% vs 6.48% net margin).
- •MKC grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.15% vs 0.92% CAGR).
- •MKC pays the higher dividend yield (4.48% vs 4.34%).
Which is better, MKC or SFD?
Metric tally: MKC 8 · SFD 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMKC(lower P/E)
GrowthMKC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMKC(higher dividend yield)
QualitySFD(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MKC | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.69● | 10.12 |
| Forward P/E | 16.92 | 9.78● |
| P/S ratio | 1.90 | 0.66● |
| P/B ratio | 2.01 | 1.49● |
| PEG ratio | 8.87 | 2.42● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.18 | 6.71● |
| FCF yield | 8.24%● | 7.96% |
Profitability
| Metric | MKC | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.62%● | 13.44% |
| Operating margin | 15.34%● | 8.62% |
| Net margin | 22.05%● | 6.48% |
| ROE | 23.28%● | 14.69% |
| ROIC | 7.93% | 9.58%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MKC | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.48%● | 4.34% |
| Payout ratio | 79.59% | 44.82% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MKC | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.15%● | 0.92% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.98% | 7.75%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.93% | 5.08%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -7.76% | — |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MKC or SFD?
- It depends on your goal. value: MKC (lower P/E); growth: MKC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MKC (higher dividend yield); quality: SFD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is MKC or SFD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MKC is cheaper: MKC trades at a 8.69 P/E and SFD at 10.12.
- Which has grown faster, MKC or SFD?
- Over the past five years, MKC grew revenue faster — MKC at a 4.15% CAGR versus SFD at 0.92%.
- Does MKC or SFD pay a bigger dividend?
- MKC yields 4.48% and SFD yields 4.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MKC or SFD more profitable?
- MKC runs the higher net margin — MKC at 22.05% versus SFD at 6.48%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
McCormick & P/E ratioSmithfield Foods P/E ratioMcCormick & dividend yieldSmithfield Foods dividend yieldMcCormick & ROESmithfield Foods ROEMcCormick & operating marginSmithfield Foods operating marginMcCormick & revenue growthSmithfield Foods revenue growthMcCormick & free cash flowSmithfield Foods free cash flow
McCormick & & Smithfield Foods appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.