Which has the lower trailing P/E, MKC or NA?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: MKC trades at 8.42 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MKC or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — MKC at a 4.15% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Does MKC or NA pay a bigger dividend?

MKC pays a dividend (3.73% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is MKC or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — MKC at 22.05% versus NA at 505.49%.

McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: MKC is classified in Consumer Defensive; NA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

MKC

McCormick & Company, Incorporated

$13.85B

$51.53Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MKC vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

MKC -33.7%NA -98.4%MKC compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MKC NA

MKC vs NA: by the numbers

•MKC is the larger company ($13.85B vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 8.42 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 22.05% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 4.15% CAGR).
•MKC pays a dividend (3.73% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MKC	NA
P/E ratio	8.42	2.30
Forward P/E	16.39	N/A
P/S ratio	1.84	11.40
P/B ratio	1.95	0.41
PEG ratio	8.59	N/A
EV / EBITDA	13.84	6.44
FCF yield	8.50%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	MKC	NA
Gross margin	38.62%	-147.33%
Operating margin	15.34%	-396.84%
Net margin	22.05%	505.49%
ROE	23.28%	17.96%
ROIC	7.93%	-10.96%

Dividends

Metric	MKC	NA
Dividend yield	3.73%	N/A
Payout ratio	64.29%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MKC	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.15%	64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.98%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-1.93%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-7.29%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MKC or NA?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: MKC trades at 8.42 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MKC or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — MKC at a 4.15% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Does MKC or NA pay a bigger dividend?: MKC pays a dividend (3.73% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is MKC or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — MKC at 22.05% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full MKC analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

McCormick & P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio McCormick & dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield McCormick & ROE Nano Labs ROE McCormick & operating margin Nano Labs operating margin McCormick & revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth McCormick & free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

McCormick & & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.