Is MHK or NCLH cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NCLH is cheaper: MHK trades at a 16.12 P/E and NCLH at 15.56.

Which has grown faster, MHK or NCLH?

Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — MHK at a 2.03% CAGR versus NCLH at 208.16%.

Is MHK or NCLH more profitable?

NCLH runs the higher net margin — MHK at 3.77% versus NCLH at 5.66%.

Which has been the better investment, MHK or NCLH?

Over the past 10-year, MHK delivered the higher annualized total return — MHK at -5.74% versus NCLH at -7.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) vs Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH)

NCLH leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MHK

Mohawk Industries, Inc.

$6.68B

$109.59Consumer Cyclical

NCLH

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

$9.07B

$19.76Consumer Cyclical

Total return — MHK vs NCLH

growth of $100 · last 13y

MHK +11.0%NCLH -25.5%MHK compounded faster

MHK NCLH

MHK vs NCLH: by the numbers

•NCLH is the larger company ($9.07B vs $6.68B market cap).
•NCLH trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.56 vs 16.12 P/E).
•NCLH converts more revenue to profit (5.66% vs 3.77% net margin).
•NCLH grew revenue faster over the past five years (208.16% vs 2.03% CAGR).

Which is better, MHK or NCLH?

Metric tally: MHK 4 · NCLH 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNCLH(lower P/E)

GrowthNCLH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityNCLH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MHK	NCLH
P/E ratio	16.12	15.56●
Forward P/E	12.52	11.18●
P/S ratio	0.60●	0.86
P/B ratio	0.79●	3.54
EV / EBITDA	6.78●	8.92
FCF yield	10.70%	—

Profitability

Metric	MHK	NCLH
Gross margin	24.34%	31.97%●
Operating margin	4.89%	15.88%●
Net margin	3.77%	5.66%●
ROE	4.95%	23.37%●
ROIC	3.54%	8.75%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MHK	NCLH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.03%	208.16%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.82%●	-22.47%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-12.83%	35.22%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-11.06%	-7.13%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, MHK or NCLH?: It depends on your goal. value: NCLH (lower P/E); growth: NCLH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NCLH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NCLH leads 10 to 4.
Is MHK or NCLH cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NCLH is cheaper: MHK trades at a 16.12 P/E and NCLH at 15.56.
Which has grown faster, MHK or NCLH?: Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — MHK at a 2.03% CAGR versus NCLH at 208.16%.
Is MHK or NCLH more profitable?: NCLH runs the higher net margin — MHK at 3.77% versus NCLH at 5.66%.
Which has been the better investment, MHK or NCLH?: Over the past 10-year, MHK delivered the higher annualized total return — MHK at -5.74% versus NCLH at -7.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MHK analysis Full NCLH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Mohawk Industries P/E ratio Norwegian Cruise Line P/E ratio Mohawk Industries dividend yield Norwegian Cruise Line dividend yield Mohawk Industries ROE Norwegian Cruise Line ROE Mohawk Industries operating margin Norwegian Cruise Line operating margin Mohawk Industries revenue growth Norwegian Cruise Line revenue growth Mohawk Industries free cash flow Norwegian Cruise Line free cash flow

Mohawk Industries & Norwegian Cruise Line appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.