Which has the lower trailing P/E, MHK or NCLH?

NCLH has the lower trailing P/E: MHK trades at 18.04 and NCLH at 10.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MHK or NCLH?

Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — MHK at a 0.62% CAGR versus NCLH at 236.47%.

Is MHK or NCLH more profitable?

NCLH runs the higher net margin — MHK at 4.15% versus NCLH at 7.49%.

How have MHK and NCLH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MHK delivered -4.24% and NCLH delivered -7.65% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) vs Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH)

A side-by-side comparison of Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MHK

Mohawk Industries, Inc.

$8.30B

$136.22Consumer CyclicalAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

NCLH

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

$7.92B

$17.24Consumer CyclicalAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — MHK vs NCLH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MHK -35.3% (-4.3%/yr)NCLH -54.2% (-7.5%/yr)MHK compounded faster over this window

MHK NCLH

MHK vs NCLH: by the numbers

•MHK is the larger company ($8.30B vs $7.92B market cap).
•NCLH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.77 vs 18.04 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NCLH converts more revenue to profit (7.49% vs 4.15% net margin).
•NCLH grew revenue faster over the past five years (236.47% vs 0.62% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MHK	NCLH
P/E ratio	18.04	10.77
Forward P/E	13.93	11.08
P/S ratio	0.74	0.79
P/B ratio	0.97	3.11
EV / EBITDA	7.60	8.74
FCF yield	9.78%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	MHK	NCLH
Gross margin	24.65%	31.97%
Operating margin	5.39%	15.09%
Net margin	4.15%	7.49%
ROE	5.43%	29.57%
ROIC	4.46%	8.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MHK	NCLH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.62%	236.47%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.82%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-6.69%	35.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-7.46%	-6.11%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MHK or NCLH?: NCLH has the lower trailing P/E: MHK trades at 18.04 and NCLH at 10.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MHK or NCLH?: Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — MHK at a 0.62% CAGR versus NCLH at 236.47%.
Is MHK or NCLH more profitable?: NCLH runs the higher net margin — MHK at 4.15% versus NCLH at 7.49%.
How have MHK and NCLH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MHK delivered -4.24% and NCLH delivered -7.65% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MHK analysis Full NCLH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Mohawk Industries P/E ratio Norwegian Cruise Line P/E ratio Mohawk Industries ROE Norwegian Cruise Line ROE Mohawk Industries operating margin Norwegian Cruise Line operating margin Mohawk Industries revenue growth Norwegian Cruise Line revenue growth Mohawk Industries free cash flow Norwegian Cruise Line free cash flow

Mohawk Industries & Norwegian Cruise Line appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.