Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN) vs Ping An Biomedical Co., Ltd. (PASW)
A side-by-side comparison of Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares and Ping An Biomedical Co., Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MGN
Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
$3.70IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:54 AM EDT
PASW
Ping An Biomedical Co., Ltd.
$0.13IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:52 AM EDT
Total return — MGN vs PASW
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yMGN -97.5% (-97.5%/yr)PASW -89.1% (-89.1%/yr)PASW compounded faster over this window
MGN PASW
MGN vs PASW: by the numbers
- •PASW is the larger company ($2M vs $2M market cap).
- •MGN is profitable (1.05% net margin) while PASW runs a net loss (-37.57%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MGN | PASW |
|---|---|---|
| P/B ratio | 0.44 | 0.36 |
Profitability
| Metric | MGN | PASW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 1.74% | 2.78% |
| Operating margin | 0.75% | -43.05% |
| Net margin | 1.05% | -37.57% |
| ROE | 1.82% | -28.36% |
| ROIC | 0.71% | -26.57% |
Frequently asked
- Is MGN or PASW more profitable?
- MGN runs the higher net margin — MGN at 1.05% versus PASW at -37.57%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares ROEPing An Biomedical ROEMegan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares operating marginPing An Biomedical operating marginMegan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares revenue growthPing An Biomedical revenue growthMegan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares free cash flowPing An Biomedical free cash flow
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.