Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) vs Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL)
META leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Meta Platforms, Inc. and Powell Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$566.98Communication Services
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
$294.75Industrials
Total return — META vs POWL
growth of $100 · last 14yMETA +1566.1%POWL +2393.7%POWL compounded faster
META POWL
META vs POWL: by the numbers
- •META is the larger company ($1.44T vs $10.74B market cap).
- •META trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.62 vs 57.61 P/E).
- •META converts more revenue to profit (32.84% vs 16.51% net margin).
- •POWL grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.84% vs 17.89% CAGR).
- •META pays the higher dividend yield (0.37% vs 0.12%).
Which is better, META or POWL?
Metric tally: META 11 · POWL 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMETA(lower P/E)
GrowthPOWL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityPOWL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | META | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.62● | 57.61 |
| Forward P/E | 16.20● | 44.88 |
| P/S ratio | 6.76● | 9.51 |
| P/B ratio | 5.97● | 15.19 |
| PEG ratio | 1.11 | 1.03● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.37● | 41.17 |
| FCF yield | 3.32%● | 1.79% |
Profitability
| Metric | META | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 81.94%● | 30.10% |
| Operating margin | 41.21%● | 19.76% |
| Net margin | 32.84%● | 16.51% |
| ROE | 28.97%● | 26.36% |
| ROIC | 17.95% | 25.41%● |
Dividends
| Metric | META | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.37%● | 0.12% |
| Payout ratio | 8.76% | 7.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | META | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.89% | 19.84%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.60% | 59.98%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.84% | 34.56%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.51% | 99.30%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, META or POWL?
- It depends on your goal. value: META (lower P/E); growth: POWL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: POWL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, META leads 11 to 6.
- Is META or POWL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, META is cheaper: META trades at a 20.62 P/E and POWL at 57.61.
- Which has grown faster, META or POWL?
- Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — META at a 17.89% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.
- Does META or POWL pay a bigger dividend?
- META yields 0.37% and POWL yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is META or POWL more profitable?
- META runs the higher net margin — META at 32.84% versus POWL at 16.51%.
- Which has been the better investment, META or POWL?
- Over the past 10-year, POWL delivered the higher annualized total return — META at 17.22% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Meta Platforms P/E ratioPowell Industries P/E ratioMeta Platforms dividend yieldPowell Industries dividend yieldMeta Platforms ROEPowell Industries ROEMeta Platforms operating marginPowell Industries operating marginMeta Platforms revenue growthPowell Industries revenue growthMeta Platforms free cash flowPowell Industries free cash flow
Meta Platforms & Powell Industries appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.