Is MET or NDAQ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MET is cheaper: MET trades at a 16.94 P/E and NDAQ at 26.89.

Which has grown faster, MET or NDAQ?

Over the past five years, NDAQ grew revenue faster — MET at a 3.40% CAGR versus NDAQ at 6.89%.

Does MET or NDAQ pay a bigger dividend?

MET yields 2.63% and NDAQ yields 1.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MET or NDAQ more profitable?

NDAQ runs the higher net margin — MET at 4.70% versus NDAQ at 23.15%.

Which has been the better investment, MET or NDAQ?

Over the past 10-year, NDAQ delivered the higher annualized total return — MET at 12.51% versus NDAQ at 17.09%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

MetLife, Inc. (MET) vs Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ)

NDAQ leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics, though MET is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of MetLife, Inc. and Nasdaq, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MET

MetLife, Inc.

$56.24B

$87.40Financial Services

NDAQ

Nasdaq, Inc.

$50.50B

$89.29Financial Services

Total return — MET vs NDAQ

growth of $100 · last 24y

MET +240.5%NDAQ +1685.8%NDAQ compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MET NDAQ

MET vs NDAQ: by the numbers

•MET is the larger company ($56.24B vs $50.50B market cap).
•MET trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.94 vs 26.89 P/E).
•NDAQ converts more revenue to profit (23.15% vs 4.70% net margin).
•NDAQ grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.89% vs 3.40% CAGR).
•MET pays the higher dividend yield (2.63% vs 1.25%).

Which is better, MET or NDAQ?

Metric tally: MET 5 · NDAQ 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMET(lower P/E)

GrowthNDAQ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMET(higher dividend yield)

QualityNDAQ(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MET	NDAQ
P/E ratio	16.94●	26.89
Forward P/E	8.81●	20.07
P/S ratio	0.74●	6.18
P/B ratio	2.10●	4.24
PEG ratio	—	0.51

Profitability

Metric	MET	NDAQ
Gross margin	28.40%	54.81%●
Operating margin	6.26%	29.53%●
Net margin	4.70%	23.15%●
ROE	13.24%	15.90%●
ROIC	0.72%	8.26%●

Dividends

Metric	MET	NDAQ
Dividend yield	2.63%●	1.25%
Payout ratio	47.81%	35.78%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MET	NDAQ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.40%	6.89%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.45%	10.62%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	9.81%	10.08%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, MET or NDAQ?: It depends on your goal. value: MET (lower P/E); growth: NDAQ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MET (higher dividend yield); quality: NDAQ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NDAQ leads 8 to 5.
Is MET or NDAQ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MET is cheaper: MET trades at a 16.94 P/E and NDAQ at 26.89.
Which has grown faster, MET or NDAQ?: Over the past five years, NDAQ grew revenue faster — MET at a 3.40% CAGR versus NDAQ at 6.89%.
Does MET or NDAQ pay a bigger dividend?: MET yields 2.63% and NDAQ yields 1.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MET or NDAQ more profitable?: NDAQ runs the higher net margin — MET at 4.70% versus NDAQ at 23.15%.
Which has been the better investment, MET or NDAQ?: Over the past 10-year, NDAQ delivered the higher annualized total return — MET at 12.51% versus NDAQ at 17.09%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MET analysis Full NDAQ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

MetLife P/E ratio Nasdaq P/E ratio MetLife dividend yield Nasdaq dividend yield MetLife ROE Nasdaq ROE MetLife operating margin Nasdaq operating margin MetLife revenue growth Nasdaq revenue growth MetLife free cash flow Nasdaq free cash flow

MetLife & Nasdaq appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.