Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) vs Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH)
A side-by-side comparison of Medpace Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
$573.29HealthcareDelayed quote: Aug 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
$96.98HealthcareDelayed quote: Aug 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MEDP vs ZBH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMEDP +1976.7%ZBH -19.7%MEDP compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MEDP ZBH
MEDP vs ZBH: by the numbers
- •ZBH is the larger company ($18.76B vs $16.00B market cap).
- •ZBH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.40 vs 33.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MEDP converts more revenue to profit (17.67% vs 9.05% net margin).
- •MEDP grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.03% vs 4.21% CAGR).
- •ZBH pays a dividend (1.02% yield), while MEDP has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MEDP | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.58 | 24.40 |
| Forward P/E | 32.57 | 11.07 |
| P/S ratio | 5.93 | 2.19 |
| P/B ratio | 38.00 | 1.45 |
| PEG ratio | 1.82 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.35 | 10.99 |
| FCF yield | 4.45% | 9.98% |
Profitability
| Metric | MEDP | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 28.76% | 61.62% |
| Operating margin | 20.97% | 15.61% |
| Net margin | 17.67% | 9.05% |
| ROE | 113.29% | 6.01% |
| ROIC | 67.94% | 5.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | MEDP | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.02% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 26.97% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MEDP | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.03% | 4.21% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 30.90% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 23.40% | 15.41% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 26.55% | -9.16% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MEDP or ZBH?
- ZBH has the lower trailing P/E: MEDP trades at 33.58 and ZBH at 24.40. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MEDP or ZBH?
- Over the past five years, MEDP grew revenue faster — MEDP at a 22.03% CAGR versus ZBH at 4.21%.
- Does MEDP or ZBH pay a bigger dividend?
- ZBH pays a dividend (1.02% yield), while MEDP has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is MEDP or ZBH more profitable?
- MEDP runs the higher net margin — MEDP at 17.67% versus ZBH at 9.05%.
- How have MEDP and ZBH total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, MEDP delivered 26.55% and ZBH delivered -2.19% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Medpace P/E ratioZimmer Biomet P/E ratioMedpace dividend yieldZimmer Biomet dividend yieldMedpace ROEZimmer Biomet ROEMedpace operating marginZimmer Biomet operating marginMedpace revenue growthZimmer Biomet revenue growthMedpace free cash flowZimmer Biomet free cash flow
Medpace & Zimmer Biomet appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 4, 2026.