Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) vs Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH)
A side-by-side comparison of Medpace Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
$611.14HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 2:15 PM EDT
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
$95.66HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 2:15 PM EDT
Total return — MEDP vs ZBH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMEDP +1870.8% (+34.7%/yr)ZBH -18.2% (-2.0%/yr)MEDP compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MEDP ZBH
MEDP vs ZBH: by the numbers
- •ZBH is the larger company ($18.51B vs $17.06B market cap).
- •ZBH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (23.27 vs 35.80 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MEDP converts more revenue to profit (17.67% vs 9.48% net margin).
- •MEDP grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.03% vs 2.89% CAGR).
- •ZBH pays a dividend (1.01% yield), while MEDP has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MEDP | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.80 | 23.27 |
| Forward P/E | 34.72 | 11.21 |
| P/S ratio | 6.13 | 2.17 |
| P/B ratio | 39.32 | 1.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.28 | 10.93 |
| FCF yield | 4.11% | 6.88% |
Profitability
| Metric | MEDP | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 28.76% | 61.62% |
| Operating margin | 20.97% | 15.73% |
| Net margin | 17.67% | 9.48% |
| ROE | 113.29% | 6.39% |
| ROIC | 77.00% | 5.51% |
Dividends
| Metric | MEDP | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.01% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 23.36% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MEDP | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.03% | 2.89% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 30.90% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 23.40% | 6.49% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.09% | -6.74% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MEDP or ZBH?
- ZBH has the lower trailing P/E: MEDP trades at 35.80 and ZBH at 23.27. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MEDP or ZBH?
- Over the past five years, MEDP grew revenue faster — MEDP at a 22.03% CAGR versus ZBH at 2.89%.
- Does MEDP or ZBH pay a bigger dividend?
- ZBH pays a dividend (1.01% yield), while MEDP has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is MEDP or ZBH more profitable?
- MEDP runs the higher net margin — MEDP at 17.67% versus ZBH at 9.48%.
- How have MEDP and ZBH total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MEDP delivered 34.83% and ZBH delivered -1.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Medpace P/E ratioZimmer Biomet P/E ratioZimmer Biomet dividend yieldMedpace ROEZimmer Biomet ROEMedpace operating marginZimmer Biomet operating marginMedpace revenue growthZimmer Biomet revenue growthMedpace free cash flowZimmer Biomet free cash flow
Medpace & Zimmer Biomet appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.