Which has the lower trailing P/E, MDLZ or PM?

MDLZ has the lower trailing P/E: MDLZ trades at 22.80 and PM at 26.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MDLZ or PM?

Over the past five years, MDLZ grew revenue faster — MDLZ at a 7.34% CAGR versus PM at 7.19%.

Does MDLZ or PM pay a bigger dividend?

MDLZ yields 3.24% and PM yields 3.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MDLZ or PM more profitable?

PM runs the higher net margin — MDLZ at 8.86% versus PM at 25.56%.

How have MDLZ and PM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MDLZ delivered 6.14% and PM delivered 11.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) vs Philip Morris International Inc. (PM)

A side-by-side comparison of Mondelez International, Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 12, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MDLZ

Mondelez International, Inc.

$78.55B

$61.55Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 11:10 AM EDT

Philip Morris International Inc.

$289.34B

$185.64Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 11:10 AM EDT

Total return — MDLZ vs PM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MDLZ +82.2% (+6.2%/yr)PM +210.8% (+12.0%/yr)PM compounded faster over this window

MDLZ PM

MDLZ vs PM: by the numbers

•PM is the larger company ($289.34B vs $78.55B market cap).
•MDLZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.80 vs 26.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PM converts more revenue to profit (25.56% vs 8.86% net margin).
•MDLZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.34% vs 7.19% CAGR).
•MDLZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.24% vs 3.16%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MDLZ	PM
P/E ratio	22.80	26.72
Forward P/E	20.28	22.23
P/S ratio	2.01	6.83
P/B ratio	3.00	N/A
EV / EBITDA	16.93	18.43
FCF yield	3.87%	4.38%

Profitability

Metric	MDLZ	PM
Gross margin	31.15%	67.51%
Operating margin	11.42%	37.75%
Net margin	8.86%	25.56%
ROE	13.20%	-113.55%
ROIC	5.13%	25.56%

Dividends

Metric	MDLZ	PM
Dividend yield	3.24%	3.16%
Payout ratio	105.82%	80.88%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MDLZ	PM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.34%	7.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-5.29%	7.10%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.85%	4.43%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.46%	18.68%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MDLZ or PM?: MDLZ has the lower trailing P/E: MDLZ trades at 22.80 and PM at 26.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MDLZ or PM?: Over the past five years, MDLZ grew revenue faster — MDLZ at a 7.34% CAGR versus PM at 7.19%.
Does MDLZ or PM pay a bigger dividend?: MDLZ yields 3.24% and PM yields 3.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MDLZ or PM more profitable?: PM runs the higher net margin — MDLZ at 8.86% versus PM at 25.56%.
How have MDLZ and PM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MDLZ delivered 6.14% and PM delivered 11.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MDLZ analysis Full PM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Mondelez International P/E ratio Philip Morris International P/E ratio Mondelez International dividend yield Philip Morris International dividend yield Mondelez International ROE Philip Morris International ROE Mondelez International operating margin Philip Morris International operating margin Mondelez International revenue growth Philip Morris International revenue growth Mondelez International free cash flow Philip Morris International free cash flow

Mondelez International & Philip Morris International appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 12, 2026.