Which has the lower trailing P/E, MDLZ or MNST?

MDLZ has the lower trailing P/E: MDLZ trades at 22.46 and MNST at 39.33. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MDLZ or MNST?

Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MDLZ at a 7.34% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.

Does MDLZ or MNST pay a bigger dividend?

MDLZ pays a dividend (3.20% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is MDLZ or MNST more profitable?

MNST runs the higher net margin — MDLZ at 8.86% versus MNST at 23.08%.

How have MDLZ and MNST total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MDLZ delivered 6.51% and MNST delivered 13.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)

A side-by-side comparison of Mondelez International, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MDLZ

Mondelez International, Inc.

$77.68B

$60.86Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MNST

Monster Beverage Corporation

$83.46B

$42.67Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MDLZ vs MNST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MDLZ +85.3% (+6.4%/yr)MNST +238.3% (+13.0%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window

MDLZ MNST

MDLZ vs MNST: by the numbers

•MNST is the larger company ($83.46B vs $77.68B market cap).
•MDLZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.46 vs 39.33 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 8.86% net margin).
•MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 7.34% CAGR).
•MDLZ pays a dividend (3.20% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MDLZ	MNST
P/E ratio	22.46	39.33
Forward P/E	19.96	36.77
P/S ratio	1.96	9.05
P/B ratio	2.92	8.91
EV / EBITDA	16.57	28.12
FCF yield	3.97%	2.51%

Profitability

Metric	MDLZ	MNST
Gross margin	31.15%	55.55%
Operating margin	11.42%	29.16%
Net margin	8.86%	23.08%
ROE	13.20%	22.72%
ROIC	6.47%	21.32%

Dividends

Metric	MDLZ	MNST
Dividend yield	3.20%	N/A
Payout ratio	73.80%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MDLZ	MNST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.34%	12.36%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-5.29%	7.95%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.85%	7.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	3.43%	12.59%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MDLZ or MNST?: MDLZ has the lower trailing P/E: MDLZ trades at 22.46 and MNST at 39.33. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MDLZ or MNST?: Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MDLZ at a 7.34% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.
Does MDLZ or MNST pay a bigger dividend?: MDLZ pays a dividend (3.20% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is MDLZ or MNST more profitable?: MNST runs the higher net margin — MDLZ at 8.86% versus MNST at 23.08%.
How have MDLZ and MNST total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MDLZ delivered 6.51% and MNST delivered 13.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MDLZ analysis Full MNST analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Mondelez International P/E ratio Monster Beverage P/E ratio Mondelez International dividend yield Mondelez International ROE Monster Beverage ROE Mondelez International operating margin Monster Beverage operating margin Mondelez International revenue growth Monster Beverage revenue growth Mondelez International free cash flow Monster Beverage free cash flow

Mondelez International & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.