Which has the lower trailing P/E, MDLZ or MNST?

MDLZ has the lower trailing P/E: MDLZ trades at 23.10 and MNST at 41.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MDLZ or MNST?

Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MDLZ at a 7.34% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.

Does MDLZ or MNST pay a bigger dividend?

MDLZ pays a dividend (3.19% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is MDLZ or MNST more profitable?

MNST runs the higher net margin — MDLZ at 8.86% versus MNST at 23.08%.

How have MDLZ and MNST total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MDLZ delivered 6.25% and MNST delivered 12.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)

A side-by-side comparison of Mondelez International, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MDLZ

Mondelez International, Inc.

$78.54B

$61.54Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 12:20 PM EDT

MNST

Monster Beverage Corporation

$89.40B

$91.41Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 12:20 PM EDT

Total return — MDLZ vs MNST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MDLZ +83.8% (+6.3%/yr)MNST +241.9% (+13.1%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window

MDLZ MNST

MDLZ vs MNST: by the numbers

•MNST is the larger company ($89.40B vs $78.54B market cap).
•MDLZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (23.10 vs 41.83 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 8.86% net margin).
•MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 7.34% CAGR).
•MDLZ pays a dividend (3.19% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MDLZ	MNST
P/E ratio	23.10	41.83
Forward P/E	20.55	39.25
P/S ratio	2.04	9.69
P/B ratio	3.04	9.54
EV / EBITDA	17.11	31.02
FCF yield	3.81%	2.35%

Profitability

Metric	MDLZ	MNST
Gross margin	31.15%	55.55%
Operating margin	11.42%	29.16%
Net margin	8.86%	23.08%
ROE	13.20%	22.72%
ROIC	5.13%	21.74%

Dividends

Metric	MDLZ	MNST
Dividend yield	3.19%	N/A
Payout ratio	105.82%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MDLZ	MNST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.34%	12.36%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-5.29%	7.95%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.85%	7.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.97%	13.25%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MDLZ or MNST?: MDLZ has the lower trailing P/E: MDLZ trades at 23.10 and MNST at 41.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MDLZ or MNST?: Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MDLZ at a 7.34% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.
Does MDLZ or MNST pay a bigger dividend?: MDLZ pays a dividend (3.19% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is MDLZ or MNST more profitable?: MNST runs the higher net margin — MDLZ at 8.86% versus MNST at 23.08%.
How have MDLZ and MNST total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MDLZ delivered 6.25% and MNST delivered 12.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MDLZ analysis Full MNST analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Mondelez International P/E ratio Monster Beverage P/E ratio Mondelez International dividend yield Mondelez International ROE Monster Beverage ROE Mondelez International operating margin Monster Beverage operating margin Mondelez International revenue growth Monster Beverage revenue growth Mondelez International free cash flow Monster Beverage free cash flow

Mondelez International & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 10, 2026.