Moody's Corporation (MCO) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH)
MCO and MRSH are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of Moody's Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MCO
Moody's Corporation
$454.06Financial Services
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$166.78Financial Services
Total return — MCO vs MRSH
growth of $100 · last 30yMCO +5192.5%MRSH +947.6%MCO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MCO MRSH
MCO vs MRSH: by the numbers
- •MCO is the larger company ($82.23B vs $80.35B market cap).
- •MRSH trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.85 vs 32.57 P/E).
- •MCO converts more revenue to profit (31.69% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •MRSH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.28% vs 6.74% CAGR).
- •MRSH pays the higher dividend yield (2.16% vs 0.87%).
Which is better, MCO or MRSH?
Metric tally: MCO 7 · MRSH 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMRSH(lower P/E)
GrowthMRSH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMRSH(higher dividend yield)
QualityMCO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MCO | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.57 | 20.85● |
| Forward P/E | 24.35 | 16.03● |
| P/S ratio | 10.23 | 2.95● |
| P/B ratio | 26.89 | 5.56● |
| PEG ratio | 1.75● | 7.79 |
Profitability
| Metric | MCO | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 69.69%● | 42.37% |
| Operating margin | 44.16%● | 21.70% |
| Net margin | 31.69%● | 14.26% |
| ROE | 83.33%● | 26.94% |
| ROIC | 21.00%● | 12.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | MCO | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.87% | 2.16%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.70% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MCO | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.74% | 9.28%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.69% | 16.34%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.16%● | 5.19% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MCO or MRSH?
- It depends on your goal. value: MRSH (lower P/E); growth: MRSH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MRSH (higher dividend yield); quality: MCO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is MCO or MRSH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MRSH is cheaper: MCO trades at a 32.57 P/E and MRSH at 20.85.
- Which has grown faster, MCO or MRSH?
- Over the past five years, MRSH grew revenue faster — MCO at a 6.74% CAGR versus MRSH at 9.28%.
- Does MCO or MRSH pay a bigger dividend?
- MCO yields 0.87% and MRSH yields 2.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MCO or MRSH more profitable?
- MCO runs the higher net margin — MCO at 31.69% versus MRSH at 14.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, MCO or MRSH?
- Over the past 10-year, MCO delivered the higher annualized total return — MCO at 18.21% versus MRSH at 11.57%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Moody's P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioMoody's dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldMoody's ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEMoody's operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginMoody's revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthMoody's free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Moody's & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.