Which has the lower trailing P/E, MCK or UI?

MCK has the lower trailing P/E: MCK trades at 22.10 and UI at 34.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MCK or UI?

Over the past five years, UI grew revenue faster — MCK at a 11.11% CAGR versus UI at 12.27%.

Does MCK or UI pay a bigger dividend?

MCK yields 0.39% and UI yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MCK or UI more profitable?

UI runs the higher net margin — MCK at 1.18% versus UI at 30.43%.

How have MCK and UI total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MCK delivered 16.64% and UI delivered 29.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

McKesson Corporation (MCK) vs Ubiquiti Inc. (UI)

A side-by-side comparison of McKesson Corporation and Ubiquiti Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: MCK is classified in Healthcare; UI is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

MCK

McKesson Corporation

$104.14B

$889.50HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Ubiquiti Inc.

$32.36B

$534.72TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MCK vs UI

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 15y

MCK +1249.1%UI +3282.1%UI compounded faster

MCK UI

MCK vs UI: by the numbers

•MCK is the larger company ($104.14B vs $32.36B market cap).
•MCK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.10 vs 34.68 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•UI converts more revenue to profit (30.43% vs 1.18% net margin).
•UI grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.27% vs 11.11% CAGR).
•UI pays the higher dividend yield (0.59% vs 0.39%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MCK	UI
P/E ratio	22.10	34.68
Forward P/E	21.79	35.38
P/S ratio	0.26	10.56
P/B ratio	N/A	27.19
PEG ratio	0.46	0.34
EV / EBITDA	15.34	28.78
FCF yield	5.69%	2.29%

Profitability

Metric	MCK	UI
Gross margin	3.61%	46.02%
Operating margin	1.58%	35.75%
Net margin	1.18%	30.43%
ROE	-219.24%	78.37%
ROIC	31.48%	72.62%

Dividends

Metric	MCK	UI
Dividend yield	0.39%	0.59%
Payout ratio	8.51%	27.19%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MCK	UI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.11%	12.27%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	40.71%	15.17%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.76%	6.21%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	33.75%	13.32%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MCK or UI?: MCK has the lower trailing P/E: MCK trades at 22.10 and UI at 34.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MCK or UI?: Over the past five years, UI grew revenue faster — MCK at a 11.11% CAGR versus UI at 12.27%.
Does MCK or UI pay a bigger dividend?: MCK yields 0.39% and UI yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MCK or UI more profitable?: UI runs the higher net margin — MCK at 1.18% versus UI at 30.43%.
How have MCK and UI total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MCK delivered 16.64% and UI delivered 29.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MCK analysis Full UI analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

McKesson P/E ratio Ubiquiti P/E ratio McKesson dividend yield Ubiquiti dividend yield McKesson ROE Ubiquiti ROE McKesson operating margin Ubiquiti operating margin McKesson revenue growth Ubiquiti revenue growth McKesson free cash flow Ubiquiti free cash flow

McKesson & Ubiquiti appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.