Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO)
MCHP and TTWO are evenly matched — 6 metrics each of 12.
A side-by-side comparison of Microchip Technology Incorporated and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 3, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated
$84.64Technology
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
$254.99Technology
Total return — MCHP vs TTWO
growth of $100 · last 29yMCHP +1685.7%TTWO +6410.4%TTWO compounded faster
MCHP TTWO
MCHP vs TTWO: by the numbers
- •TTWO is the larger company ($47.34B vs $45.88B market cap).
- •MCHP is profitable (4.29% net margin) while TTWO runs a net loss (-4.48%).
- •TTWO grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.57% vs -2.82% CAGR).
- •MCHP pays a dividend (2.15% yield) while TTWO does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MCHP or TTWO?
Metric tally: MCHP 6 · TTWO 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthTTWO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMCHP(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MCHP | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 319.52 | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 65.25 |
| P/S ratio | 9.84 | 7.10● |
| P/B ratio | 7.21● | 13.46 |
| EV / EBITDA | 43.81 | 39.04● |
| FCF yield | 1.88%● | 0.95% |
Profitability
| Metric | MCHP | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 57.73% | 57.23% |
| Operating margin | 10.40%● | -0.88% |
| Net margin | 4.29%● | -4.48% |
| ROE | 3.14%● | -8.49% |
| ROIC | 3.11%● | -1.24% |
Dividends
| Metric | MCHP | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | — |
| Payout ratio | 674.07% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MCHP | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.82% | 14.57%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -16.62% | 37.75%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.74% | -11.80%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.88% | 7.54%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MCHP or TTWO?
- It depends on your goal. growth: TTWO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MCHP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Which has grown faster, MCHP or TTWO?
- Over the past five years, TTWO grew revenue faster — MCHP at a -2.82% CAGR versus TTWO at 14.57%.
- Does MCHP or TTWO pay a bigger dividend?
- MCHP pays a dividend (2.15% yield) while TTWO does not currently pay one.
- Is MCHP or TTWO more profitable?
- MCHP runs the higher net margin — MCHP at 4.29% versus TTWO at -4.48%.
- Which has been the better investment, MCHP or TTWO?
- Over the past 10-year, TTWO delivered the higher annualized total return — MCHP at 15.02% versus TTWO at 20.99%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Microchip Technology P/E ratioTake-Two Interactive Software P/E ratioMicrochip Technology dividend yieldTake-Two Interactive Software dividend yieldMicrochip Technology ROETake-Two Interactive Software ROEMicrochip Technology operating marginTake-Two Interactive Software operating marginMicrochip Technology revenue growthTake-Two Interactive Software revenue growthMicrochip Technology free cash flowTake-Two Interactive Software free cash flow
Microchip Technology & Take-Two Interactive Software appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 3, 2026.