Which has the lower trailing P/E, MATX or MSM?

MATX has the lower trailing P/E: MATX trades at 14.82 and MSM at 29.47. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MATX or MSM?

Over the past five years, MSM grew revenue faster — MATX at a 3.36% CAGR versus MSM at 4.34%.

Does MATX or MSM pay a bigger dividend?

MATX yields 0.66% and MSM yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MATX or MSM more profitable?

MATX runs the higher net margin — MATX at 13.41% versus MSM at 5.90%.

How have MATX and MSM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MATX delivered 21.93% and MSM delivered 10.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Matson, Inc. (MATX) vs MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (MSM)

A side-by-side comparison of Matson, Inc. and MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 27, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MATX

Matson, Inc.

$6.72B

$222.07IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MSM

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.

$6.81B

$122.01IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MATX vs MSM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MATX +614.7% (+21.7%/yr)MSM +153.4% (+9.7%/yr)MATX compounded faster over this window

MATX MSM

MATX vs MSM: by the numbers

•MSM is the larger company ($6.81B vs $6.72B market cap).
•MATX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.82 vs 29.47 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MATX converts more revenue to profit (13.41% vs 5.90% net margin).
•MSM grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.34% vs 3.36% CAGR).
•MSM pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 0.66%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MATX	MSM
P/E ratio	14.82	29.47
Forward P/E	13.81	26.45
P/S ratio	1.94	1.75
P/B ratio	2.42	4.81
EV / EBITDA	9.48	16.49
FCF yield	1.84%	3.22%

Profitability

Metric	MATX	MSM
Gross margin	23.02%	40.82%
Operating margin	14.49%	8.80%
Net margin	13.41%	5.90%
ROE	16.72%	16.24%
ROIC	10.16%	12.36%

Dividends

Metric	MATX	MSM
Dividend yield	0.66%	2.85%
Payout ratio	10.40%	97.48%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MATX	MSM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.36%	4.34%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	25.67%	-4.65%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-15.37%	5.48%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	25.56%	11.51%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MATX or MSM?: MATX has the lower trailing P/E: MATX trades at 14.82 and MSM at 29.47. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MATX or MSM?: Over the past five years, MSM grew revenue faster — MATX at a 3.36% CAGR versus MSM at 4.34%.
Does MATX or MSM pay a bigger dividend?: MATX yields 0.66% and MSM yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MATX or MSM more profitable?: MATX runs the higher net margin — MATX at 13.41% versus MSM at 5.90%.
How have MATX and MSM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MATX delivered 21.93% and MSM delivered 10.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MATX analysis Full MSM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Matson P/E ratio MSC Industrial Direct P/E ratio Matson dividend yield MSC Industrial Direct dividend yield Matson ROE MSC Industrial Direct ROE Matson operating margin MSC Industrial Direct operating margin Matson revenue growth MSC Industrial Direct revenue growth Matson free cash flow MSC Industrial Direct free cash flow

Matson & MSC Industrial Direct appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 27, 2026.