Which has the lower trailing P/E, MAS or STRL?

MAS has the lower trailing P/E: MAS trades at 20.14 and STRL at 56.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MAS or STRL?

Over the past five years, STRL grew revenue faster — MAS at a 0.27% CAGR versus STRL at 14.81%.

Does MAS or STRL pay a bigger dividend?

MAS pays a dividend (1.55% yield), while STRL is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is MAS or STRL more profitable?

STRL runs the higher net margin — MAS at 10.90% versus STRL at 12.02%.

How have MAS and STRL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MAS delivered 10.00% and STRL delivered 60.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Masco Corporation (MAS) vs Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL)

A side-by-side comparison of Masco Corporation and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MAS

Masco Corporation

$16.46B

$81.61IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

STRL

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.

$16.51B

$538.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MAS vs STRL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

MAS +1111.0%STRL +48947.2%STRL compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MAS STRL

MAS vs STRL: by the numbers

•STRL is the larger company ($16.51B vs $16.46B market cap).
•MAS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.14 vs 56.76 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•STRL converts more revenue to profit (12.02% vs 10.90% net margin).
•STRL grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.81% vs 0.27% CAGR).
•MAS pays a dividend (1.55% yield), while STRL is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MAS	STRL
P/E ratio	20.14	56.76
Forward P/E	18.96	33.59
P/S ratio	2.14	6.83
P/B ratio	N/A	16.56
PEG ratio	5.61	2.34
EV / EBITDA	13.46	33.62
FCF yield	5.73%	2.24%

Profitability

Metric	MAS	STRL
Gross margin	35.41%	23.29%
Operating margin	16.79%	17.25%
Net margin	10.90%	12.02%
ROE	-435.48%	29.14%
ROIC	26.15%	19.06%

Dividends

Metric	MAS	STRL
Dividend yield	1.55%	N/A
Payout ratio	32.47%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MAS	STRL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.27%	14.81%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.07%	44.28%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.44%	31.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.32%	97.56%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MAS or STRL?: MAS has the lower trailing P/E: MAS trades at 20.14 and STRL at 56.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MAS or STRL?: Over the past five years, STRL grew revenue faster — MAS at a 0.27% CAGR versus STRL at 14.81%.
Does MAS or STRL pay a bigger dividend?: MAS pays a dividend (1.55% yield), while STRL is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is MAS or STRL more profitable?: STRL runs the higher net margin — MAS at 10.90% versus STRL at 12.02%.
How have MAS and STRL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MAS delivered 10.00% and STRL delivered 60.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MAS analysis Full STRL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Masco P/E ratio Sterling Infrastructure P/E ratio Masco dividend yield Sterling Infrastructure dividend yield Masco ROE Sterling Infrastructure ROE Masco operating margin Sterling Infrastructure operating margin Masco revenue growth Sterling Infrastructure revenue growth Masco free cash flow Sterling Infrastructure free cash flow

Masco & Sterling Infrastructure appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.