Which has grown faster, MARA or WSFS?

Over the past five years, MARA grew revenue faster — MARA at a 80.53% CAGR versus WSFS at 15.01%.

Does MARA or WSFS pay a bigger dividend?

WSFS pays a dividend (0.97% yield), while MARA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is MARA or WSFS more profitable?

WSFS runs the higher net margin — MARA at -429.71% versus WSFS at 23.43%.

How have MARA and WSFS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MARA delivered -12.49% and WSFS delivered 9.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) vs WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS)

A side-by-side comparison of Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. and WSFS Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MARA

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

$4.18B

$10.97Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WSFS

WSFS Financial Corporation

$3.95B

$75.92Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MARA vs WSFS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MARA -73.7% (-12.5%/yr)WSFS +141.2% (+9.2%/yr)WSFS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MARA WSFS

MARA vs WSFS: by the numbers

•MARA is the larger company ($4.18B vs $3.95B market cap).
•WSFS is profitable (23.43% net margin) while MARA runs a net loss (-429.71%).
•MARA grew revenue faster over the past five years (80.53% vs 15.01% CAGR).
•WSFS pays a dividend (0.97% yield), while MARA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MARA	WSFS
P/E ratio	N/A	12.72
Forward P/E	N/A	11.48
PEG ratio	N/A	0.73
P/S ratio	5.20	2.89
P/B ratio	2.52	1.45

Profitability

Metric	MARA	WSFS
Gross margin	-47.73%	N/A
Operating margin	-90.64%	31.34%
Net margin	-429.71%	23.43%
ROE	-208.11%	11.77%

WSFS Financial Corporation: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

Metric	MARA	WSFS
Dividend yield	N/A	0.97%
Payout ratio	N/A	12.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MARA	WSFS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	80.53%	15.01%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	17.53%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.38%	9.01%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, MARA or WSFS?: Over the past five years, MARA grew revenue faster — MARA at a 80.53% CAGR versus WSFS at 15.01%.
Does MARA or WSFS pay a bigger dividend?: WSFS pays a dividend (0.97% yield), while MARA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is MARA or WSFS more profitable?: WSFS runs the higher net margin — MARA at -429.71% versus WSFS at 23.43%.
How have MARA and WSFS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MARA delivered -12.49% and WSFS delivered 9.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MARA analysis Full WSFS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

WSFS Financial P/E ratio WSFS Financial dividend yield Marathon Digital ROE WSFS Financial ROE Marathon Digital operating margin WSFS Financial operating margin Marathon Digital revenue growth WSFS Financial revenue growth

Marathon Digital & WSFS Financial appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.