Which has the lower trailing P/E, MANH or UI?

UI has the lower trailing P/E: MANH trades at 57.83 and UI at 35.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MANH or UI?

Over the past five years, MANH grew revenue faster — MANH at a 12.69% CAGR versus UI at 11.52%.

Does MANH or UI pay a bigger dividend?

UI pays a dividend (0.65% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is MANH or UI more profitable?

UI runs the higher net margin — MANH at 18.67% versus UI at 29.33%.

How have MANH and UI total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MANH delivered 13.30% and UI delivered 27.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) vs Ubiquiti Inc. (UI)

A side-by-side comparison of Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Ubiquiti Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MANH

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

$11.77B

$201.82TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Ubiquiti Inc.

$34.14B

$564.15TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MANH vs UI

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MANH +247.3% (+13.3%/yr)UI +961.8% (+26.6%/yr)UI compounded faster over this window

MANH UI

MANH vs UI: by the numbers

•UI is the larger company ($34.14B vs $11.77B market cap).
•UI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.59 vs 57.83 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•UI converts more revenue to profit (29.33% vs 18.67% net margin).
•MANH grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.69% vs 11.52% CAGR).
•UI pays a dividend (0.65% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MANH	UI
P/E ratio	57.83	35.59
Forward P/E	36.71	31.85
P/S ratio	10.45	10.43
P/B ratio	74.71	23.71
EV / EBITDA	41.45	27.98
FCF yield	3.39%	2.66%

Profitability

Metric	MANH	UI
Gross margin	54.65%	46.16%
Operating margin	24.33%	36.21%
Net margin	18.67%	29.33%
ROE	133.48%	66.68%
ROIC	90.92%	61.23%

Dividends

Metric	MANH	UI
Dividend yield	N/A	0.65%
Payout ratio	N/A	21.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MANH	UI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.69%	11.52%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.59%	10.14%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.51%	8.89%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.78%	11.59%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MANH or UI?: UI has the lower trailing P/E: MANH trades at 57.83 and UI at 35.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MANH or UI?: Over the past five years, MANH grew revenue faster — MANH at a 12.69% CAGR versus UI at 11.52%.
Does MANH or UI pay a bigger dividend?: UI pays a dividend (0.65% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is MANH or UI more profitable?: UI runs the higher net margin — MANH at 18.67% versus UI at 29.33%.
How have MANH and UI total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MANH delivered 13.30% and UI delivered 27.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MANH analysis Full UI analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Manhattan Associates P/E ratio Ubiquiti P/E ratio Ubiquiti dividend yield Manhattan Associates ROE Ubiquiti ROE Manhattan Associates operating margin Ubiquiti operating margin Manhattan Associates revenue growth Ubiquiti revenue growth Manhattan Associates free cash flow Ubiquiti free cash flow

Manhattan Associates & Ubiquiti appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.