Which has the lower trailing P/E, MANH or SANM?

SANM has the lower trailing P/E: MANH trades at 58.49 and SANM at 40.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MANH or SANM?

Over the past five years, MANH grew revenue faster — MANH at a 12.69% CAGR versus SANM at 12.21%.

Is MANH or SANM more profitable?

MANH runs the higher net margin — MANH at 18.67% versus SANM at 2.41%.

How have MANH and SANM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MANH delivered 13.48% and SANM delivered 22.79% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) vs Sanmina Corporation (SANM)

A side-by-side comparison of Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Sanmina Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MANH

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

$11.90B

$204.15TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SANM

Sanmina Corporation

$12.28B

$229.04TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MANH vs SANM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MANH +264.6% (+13.8%/yr)SANM +672.0% (+22.7%/yr)SANM compounded faster over this window

MANH SANM

MANH vs SANM: by the numbers

•SANM is the larger company ($12.28B vs $11.90B market cap).
•SANM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (40.97 vs 58.49 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MANH converts more revenue to profit (18.67% vs 2.41% net margin).
•MANH grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.69% vs 12.21% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MANH	SANM
P/E ratio	58.49	40.97
Forward P/E	37.15	16.44
PEG ratio	2.72	2.30
P/S ratio	10.57	0.96
P/B ratio	75.57	4.80
EV / EBITDA	41.94	15.81
FCF yield	3.35%	4.84%

Profitability

Metric	MANH	SANM
Gross margin	54.65%	9.01%
Operating margin	24.33%	5.09%
Net margin	18.67%	2.41%
ROE	133.48%	12.04%
ROIC	90.92%	8.27%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MANH	SANM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.69%	12.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.59%	17.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.51%	18.86%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.57%	41.47%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MANH or SANM?: SANM has the lower trailing P/E: MANH trades at 58.49 and SANM at 40.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MANH or SANM?: Over the past five years, MANH grew revenue faster — MANH at a 12.69% CAGR versus SANM at 12.21%.
Is MANH or SANM more profitable?: MANH runs the higher net margin — MANH at 18.67% versus SANM at 2.41%.
How have MANH and SANM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MANH delivered 13.48% and SANM delivered 22.79% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MANH analysis Full SANM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Manhattan Associates P/E ratio Sanmina P/E ratio Manhattan Associates ROE Sanmina ROE Manhattan Associates operating margin Sanmina operating margin Manhattan Associates revenue growth Sanmina revenue growth Manhattan Associates free cash flow Sanmina free cash flow

Manhattan Associates & Sanmina appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.