Mako Mining Corp Common Stock (MAKO) vs Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (SCZM)

A side-by-side comparison of Mako Mining Corp Common Stock and Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — MAKO vs SCZM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1y
MAKO +8.4% (+8.4%/yr)SCZM -26.5% (-26.5%/yr)MAKO compounded faster over this window
6080100120Start $100$108$73
MAKO SCZM

MAKO vs SCZM: by the numbers

  • •SCZM is the larger company ($847M vs $804M market cap).
  • •MAKO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.83 vs 20.74 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •MAKO converts more revenue to profit (25.13% vs 9.95% net margin).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricMAKOSCZM
P/E ratio15.8320.74
Forward P/E12.098.91
P/S ratio3.872.01
P/B ratio4.233.98
EV / EBITDA8.235.46
FCF yield7.01%3.42%

Profitability

MetricMAKOSCZM
Gross margin51.85%35.90%
Operating margin40.69%29.81%
Net margin25.13%9.95%
ROE27.45%19.72%
ROIC20.35%18.96%

Growth (annualized)

MetricMAKOSCZM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A56.85%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MAKO or SCZM?
MAKO has the lower trailing P/E: MAKO trades at 15.83 and SCZM at 20.74. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Is MAKO or SCZM more profitable?
MAKO runs the higher net margin — MAKO at 25.13% versus SCZM at 9.95%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.