Macy's, Inc. (M) vs Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA)

A side-by-side comparison of Macy's, Inc. and Rush Enterprises, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — M vs RUSHA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
M -6.4% (-0.7%/yr)RUSHA +619.9% (+21.8%/yr)RUSHA compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001kStart $10020182020202220242026$94$720
M RUSHA

M vs RUSHA: by the numbers

  • •M is the larger company ($5.91B vs $5.48B market cap).
  • •M trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.25 vs 14.17 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •RUSHA converts more revenue to profit (3.67% vs 3.29% net margin).
  • •RUSHA grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.70% vs -0.56% CAGR).
  • •M pays the higher dividend yield (3.36% vs 1.10%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricMRUSHA
P/E ratio8.2514.17
Forward P/E9.6719.08
PEG ratioN/A1.37
P/S ratio0.260.76
P/B ratio1.202.35
EV / EBITDA4.8912.48
FCF yield25.25%2.29%

Profitability

MetricMRUSHA
Gross margin36.03%18.98%
Operating margin4.88%5.13%
Net margin3.29%3.67%
ROE15.20%11.38%
ROIC7.22%7.17%

Dividends

MetricMRUSHA
Dividend yield3.36%1.10%
Payout ratio27.83%15.66%

Growth (annualized)

MetricMRUSHA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-0.56%7.70%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A19.21%
FCF CAGR (5Y)-15.90%-22.34%
Total return CAGR (5Y)4.14%19.56%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, M or RUSHA?
M has the lower trailing P/E: M trades at 8.25 and RUSHA at 14.17. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, M or RUSHA?
Over the past five years, RUSHA grew revenue faster — M at a -0.56% CAGR versus RUSHA at 7.70%.
Does M or RUSHA pay a bigger dividend?
M yields 3.36% and RUSHA yields 1.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is M or RUSHA more profitable?
RUSHA runs the higher net margin — M at 3.29% versus RUSHA at 3.67%.
How have M and RUSHA total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, M delivered -0.62% and RUSHA delivered 21.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.