Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
A side-by-side comparison of Lyft, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: LYFT is classified in Technology; UHS is classified in Healthcare. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
$15.45TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$166.22HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — LYFT vs UHS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yLYFT -80.7%UHS +22.7%UHS compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LYFT UHS
LYFT vs UHS: by the numbers
- •UHS is the larger company ($10.06B vs $5.87B market cap).
- •LYFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.20 vs 6.69 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •LYFT converts more revenue to profit (43.82% vs 8.56% net margin).
- •LYFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.43% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •UHS pays a dividend (0.50% yield), while LYFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LYFT | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 2.20 | 6.69 |
| Forward P/E | 25.64 | 6.79 |
| P/S ratio | 0.93 | 0.55 |
| P/B ratio | 2.01 | 1.31 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 0.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 5.56 |
| FCF yield | 19.01% | 9.09% |
Profitability
| Metric | LYFT | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 43.24% | 90.45% |
| Operating margin | -2.53% | 11.50% |
| Net margin | 43.82% | 8.56% |
| ROE | 94.37% | 20.19% |
| ROIC | 217.84% | 11.29% |
Dividends
| Metric | LYFT | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.50% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 3.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LYFT | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 26.43% | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 16.19% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -4.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -22.81% | 0.55% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LYFT or UHS?
- LYFT has the lower trailing P/E: LYFT trades at 2.20 and UHS at 6.69. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LYFT or UHS?
- Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — LYFT at a 26.43% CAGR versus UHS at 8.63%.
- Does LYFT or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- UHS pays a dividend (0.50% yield), while LYFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is LYFT or UHS more profitable?
- LYFT runs the higher net margin — LYFT at 43.82% versus UHS at 8.56%.
- How have LYFT and UHS total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, LYFT delivered -22.81% and UHS delivered 2.45% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lyft P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioLyft dividend yieldUniversal Health Services dividend yieldLyft ROEUniversal Health Services ROELyft operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginLyft revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthLyft free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
Lyft & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.