Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
A side-by-side comparison of Lyft, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: LYFT is classified in Technology; UHS is classified in Healthcare. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
$15.32TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$174.83HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — LYFT vs UHS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yLYFT -79.3% (-20.1%/yr)UHS +35.7% (+4.5%/yr)UHS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LYFT UHS
LYFT vs UHS: by the numbers
- •UHS is the larger company ($10.58B vs $5.82B market cap).
- •LYFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.23 vs 7.17 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •LYFT converts more revenue to profit (42.32% vs 8.42% net margin).
- •LYFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.62% vs 8.21% CAGR).
- •UHS pays a dividend (0.46% yield), while LYFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LYFT | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 2.23 | 7.17 |
| Forward P/E | 26.61 | 7.76 |
| P/S ratio | 0.86 | 0.58 |
| P/B ratio | 1.92 | 1.41 |
| EV / EBITDA | 92.45 | 5.82 |
| FCF yield | 19.69% | 7.81% |
Profitability
| Metric | LYFT | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 45.52% | 90.69% |
| Operating margin | -1.77% | 11.36% |
| Net margin | 42.32% | 8.42% |
| ROE | 94.78% | 20.31% |
| ROIC | -2.83% | 11.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | LYFT | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.46% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 3.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LYFT | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.62% | 8.21% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 16.19% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -12.18% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -21.38% | 3.74% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LYFT or UHS?
- LYFT has the lower trailing P/E: LYFT trades at 2.23 and UHS at 7.17. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LYFT or UHS?
- Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — LYFT at a 22.62% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.
- Does LYFT or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- UHS pays a dividend (0.46% yield), while LYFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is LYFT or UHS more profitable?
- LYFT runs the higher net margin — LYFT at 42.32% versus UHS at 8.42%.
- How have LYFT and UHS total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, LYFT delivered -21.38% and UHS delivered 3.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lyft P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioUniversal Health Services dividend yieldLyft ROEUniversal Health Services ROELyft operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginLyft revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthLyft free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
Lyft & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.