Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) vs Rio Tinto Group (RIO)
A side-by-side comparison of Lyft, Inc. and Rio Tinto Group across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: LYFT is classified in Technology; RIO is classified in Basic Materials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
$15.45TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
$91.64Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — LYFT vs RIO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yLYFT -80.7%RIO +181.1%RIO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LYFT RIO
LYFT vs RIO: by the numbers
- •RIO is the larger company ($148.82B vs $5.87B market cap).
- •LYFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.20 vs 6.98 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •LYFT converts more revenue to profit (43.82% vs 19.28% net margin).
- •LYFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.43% vs 4.92% CAGR).
- •RIO pays a dividend (4.37% yield), while LYFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LYFT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 2.20 | 6.98 |
| Forward P/E | 25.64 | 11.23 |
| P/S ratio | 0.93 | 1.35 |
| P/B ratio | 2.01 | 2.42 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 19.39 |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 3.99 |
| FCF yield | 19.01% | 7.15% |
Profitability
| Metric | LYFT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 43.24% | 27.57% |
| Operating margin | -2.53% | 27.10% |
| Net margin | 43.82% | 19.28% |
| ROE | 94.37% | 34.53% |
| ROIC | 217.84% | 9.18% |
Dividends
| Metric | LYFT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 4.37% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 65.37% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LYFT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 26.43% | 4.92% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 0.36% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -11.74% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -22.81% | 10.41% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LYFT or RIO?
- LYFT has the lower trailing P/E: LYFT trades at 2.20 and RIO at 6.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LYFT or RIO?
- Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — LYFT at a 26.43% CAGR versus RIO at 4.92%.
- Does LYFT or RIO pay a bigger dividend?
- RIO pays a dividend (4.37% yield), while LYFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is LYFT or RIO more profitable?
- LYFT runs the higher net margin — LYFT at 43.82% versus RIO at 19.28%.
- How have LYFT and RIO total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, LYFT delivered -22.81% and RIO delivered 19.50% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lyft P/E ratioRio Tinto P/E ratioLyft dividend yieldRio Tinto dividend yieldLyft ROERio Tinto ROELyft operating marginRio Tinto operating marginLyft revenue growthRio Tinto revenue growthLyft free cash flowRio Tinto free cash flow
Lyft & Rio Tinto appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.