Is LYFT or PATH cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LYFT is cheaper: LYFT trades at a 1.98 P/E and PATH at 17.50.

Which has grown faster, LYFT or PATH?

Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — LYFT at a 26.43% CAGR versus PATH at 19.70%.

Is LYFT or PATH more profitable?

LYFT runs the higher net margin — LYFT at 43.82% versus PATH at 19.58%.

Which has been the better investment, LYFT or PATH?

Over the past 5-year, LYFT delivered the higher annualized total return — LYFT at -24.74% versus PATH at -31.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) vs UiPath Inc. (PATH)

LYFT leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lyft, Inc. and UiPath Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — LYFT vs PATH

growth of $100 · last 5y

LYFT -77.7%PATH -84.7%LYFT compounded faster

LYFT PATH

LYFT vs PATH: by the numbers

•PATH is the larger company ($5.61B vs $5.14B market cap).
•LYFT trades at the lower earnings multiple (1.98 vs 17.50 P/E).
•LYFT converts more revenue to profit (43.82% vs 19.58% net margin).
•LYFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.43% vs 19.70% CAGR).

Which is better, LYFT or PATH?

Metric tally: LYFT 10 · PATH 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLYFT(lower P/E)

GrowthLYFT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLYFT(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	LYFT	PATH
P/E ratio	1.98●	17.50
Forward P/E	13.63●	15.66
P/S ratio	0.84●	3.33
P/B ratio	1.80●	2.93
EV / EBITDA	79.16	31.26●
FCF yield	21.19%●	6.74%

Profitability

Metric	LYFT	PATH
Gross margin	43.24%	82.96%●
Operating margin	-2.53%	6.19%●
Net margin	43.82%●	19.58%
ROE	94.37%●	17.21%
ROIC	217.84%●	2.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LYFT	PATH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	26.43%●	19.70%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	65.27%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-24.74%●	-31.79%

Frequently asked

Which is better, LYFT or PATH?: It depends on your goal. value: LYFT (lower P/E); growth: LYFT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LYFT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LYFT leads 10 to 3.
Is LYFT or PATH cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LYFT is cheaper: LYFT trades at a 1.98 P/E and PATH at 17.50.
Which has grown faster, LYFT or PATH?: Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — LYFT at a 26.43% CAGR versus PATH at 19.70%.
Is LYFT or PATH more profitable?: LYFT runs the higher net margin — LYFT at 43.82% versus PATH at 19.58%.
Which has been the better investment, LYFT or PATH?: Over the past 5-year, LYFT delivered the higher annualized total return — LYFT at -24.74% versus PATH at -31.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LYFT analysis Full PATH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lyft P/E ratio UiPath P/E ratio Lyft dividend yield UiPath dividend yield Lyft ROE UiPath ROE Lyft operating margin UiPath operating margin Lyft revenue growth UiPath revenue growth Lyft free cash flow UiPath free cash flow

Lyft & UiPath appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.