Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) vs McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC)
A side-by-side comparison of Lyft, Inc. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: LYFT is classified in Technology; MKC is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
$15.32TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$51.32Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — LYFT vs MKC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yLYFT -80.8% (-21.0%/yr)MKC -17.5% (-2.7%/yr)MKC compounded faster over this window
LYFT MKC
LYFT vs MKC: by the numbers
- •MKC is the larger company ($13.80B vs $5.82B market cap).
- •LYFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.23 vs 8.54 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •LYFT converts more revenue to profit (42.32% vs 22.05% net margin).
- •LYFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.62% vs 4.15% CAGR).
- •MKC pays a dividend (3.70% yield), while LYFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LYFT | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 2.23 | 8.54 |
| Forward P/E | 26.61 | 16.63 |
| P/S ratio | 0.86 | 1.87 |
| P/B ratio | 1.92 | 1.97 |
| EV / EBITDA | 92.45 | 13.24 |
| FCF yield | 19.69% | 7.15% |
Profitability
| Metric | LYFT | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 45.52% | 38.62% |
| Operating margin | -1.77% | 15.34% |
| Net margin | 42.32% | 22.05% |
| ROE | 94.78% | 23.28% |
| ROIC | -2.83% | 6.16% |
Dividends
| Metric | LYFT | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.70% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 31.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LYFT | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.62% | 4.15% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 0.98% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -1.93% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -21.38% | -7.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LYFT or MKC?
- LYFT has the lower trailing P/E: LYFT trades at 2.23 and MKC at 8.54. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LYFT or MKC?
- Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — LYFT at a 22.62% CAGR versus MKC at 4.15%.
- Does LYFT or MKC pay a bigger dividend?
- MKC pays a dividend (3.70% yield), while LYFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is LYFT or MKC more profitable?
- LYFT runs the higher net margin — LYFT at 42.32% versus MKC at 22.05%.
- How have LYFT and MKC total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, LYFT delivered -21.38% and MKC delivered -7.71% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lyft P/E ratioMcCormick P/E ratioMcCormick dividend yieldLyft ROEMcCormick ROELyft operating marginMcCormick operating marginLyft revenue growthMcCormick revenue growthLyft free cash flowMcCormick free cash flow
Lyft & McCormick appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.