Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) vs Universal Corporation (UVV)
LW leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Universal Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$45.16Consumer Defensive
UVV
Universal Corporation
$53.79Consumer Defensive
Total return — LW vs UVV
growth of $100 · last 10yLW +32.8%UVV -0.8%LW compounded faster
LW UVV
LW vs UVV: by the numbers
- •LW is the larger company ($6.24B vs $1.34B market cap).
- •LW trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.10 vs 41.38 P/E).
- •LW converts more revenue to profit (4.61% vs 1.12% net margin).
- •LW grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.30% vs 8.08% CAGR).
- •UVV pays the higher dividend yield (6.17% vs 3.37%).
Which is better, LW or UVV?
Metric tally: LW 10 · UVV 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLW(lower P/E)
GrowthLW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeUVV(higher dividend yield)
QualityLW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LW | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.10● | 41.38 |
| Forward P/E | 15.48 | 12.90● |
| P/S ratio | 0.97 | 0.46● |
| P/B ratio | 3.44 | 0.96● |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.31 | 8.52● |
| FCF yield | 10.08%● | 5.92% |
Profitability
| Metric | LW | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 20.57%● | 17.47% |
| Operating margin | 9.33%● | 7.13% |
| Net margin | 4.61%● | 1.12% |
| ROE | 16.44%● | 2.31% |
| ROIC | 7.43%● | 4.61% |
Dividends
| Metric | LW | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.37% | 6.17%● |
| Payout ratio | 60.56% | 255.38% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LW | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.30%● | 8.08% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.93%● | -18.20% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.92%● | -12.25% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.26% | 5.46%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LW or UVV?
- It depends on your goal. value: LW (lower P/E); growth: LW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: UVV (higher dividend yield); quality: LW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LW leads 10 to 6.
- Is LW or UVV cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LW is cheaper: LW trades at a 21.10 P/E and UVV at 41.38.
- Which has grown faster, LW or UVV?
- Over the past five years, LW grew revenue faster — LW at a 12.30% CAGR versus UVV at 8.08%.
- Does LW or UVV pay a bigger dividend?
- LW yields 3.37% and UVV yields 6.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LW or UVV more profitable?
- LW runs the higher net margin — LW at 4.61% versus UVV at 1.12%.
- Which has been the better investment, LW or UVV?
- Over the past 5-year, UVV delivered the higher annualized total return — LW at -9.26% versus UVV at 5.39%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lamb Weston P/E ratioUniversal P/E ratioLamb Weston dividend yieldUniversal dividend yieldLamb Weston ROEUniversal ROELamb Weston operating marginUniversal operating marginLamb Weston revenue growthUniversal revenue growthLamb Weston free cash flowUniversal free cash flow
Lamb Weston & Universal appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.