Which has the lower trailing P/E, LW or UVV?

LW has the lower trailing P/E: LW trades at 20.76 and UVV at 55.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LW or UVV?

Over the past five years, LW grew revenue faster — LW at a 12.49% CAGR versus UVV at 7.19%.

Does LW or UVV pay a bigger dividend?

LW yields 3.16% and UVV yields 7.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LW or UVV more profitable?

LW runs the higher net margin — LW at 4.39% versus UVV at 0.67%.

How have LW and UVV total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, LW delivered -2.69% and UVV delivered 4.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) vs Universal Corporation (UVV)

A side-by-side comparison of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Universal Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.

$5.94B

$43.18Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

UVV

Universal Corporation

$1.04B

$41.87Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LW vs UVV

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LW +72.4% (+5.6%/yr)UVV +41.2% (+3.5%/yr)LW compounded faster over this window

LW UVV

LW vs UVV: by the numbers

•LW is the larger company ($5.94B vs $1.04B market cap).
•LW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.76 vs 55.09 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LW converts more revenue to profit (4.39% vs 0.67% net margin).
•LW grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 7.19% CAGR).
•UVV pays the higher dividend yield (7.25% vs 3.16%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LW	UVV
P/E ratio	20.76	55.09
Forward P/E	14.28	N/A
P/S ratio	0.90	0.37
P/B ratio	3.25	0.75
EV / EBITDA	10.03	9.09
FCF yield	N/A	15.75%

Profitability

Metric	LW	UVV
Gross margin	20.56%	16.82%
Operating margin	8.94%	6.20%
Net margin	4.39%	0.67%
ROE	15.89%	1.38%
ROIC	6.54%	3.56%

Dividends

Metric	LW	UVV
Dividend yield	3.16%	7.25%
Payout ratio	72.60%	432.89%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LW	UVV
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.49%	7.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	10.92%	-18.20%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.64%	-12.25%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.69%	4.64%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LW or UVV?: LW has the lower trailing P/E: LW trades at 20.76 and UVV at 55.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LW or UVV?: Over the past five years, LW grew revenue faster — LW at a 12.49% CAGR versus UVV at 7.19%.
Does LW or UVV pay a bigger dividend?: LW yields 3.16% and UVV yields 7.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LW or UVV more profitable?: LW runs the higher net margin — LW at 4.39% versus UVV at 0.67%.
How have LW and UVV total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, LW delivered -2.69% and UVV delivered 4.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LW analysis Full UVV analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lamb Weston P/E ratio Universal P/E ratio Lamb Weston dividend yield Universal dividend yield Lamb Weston ROE Universal ROE Lamb Weston operating margin Universal operating margin Lamb Weston revenue growth Universal revenue growth Lamb Weston free cash flow Universal free cash flow

Lamb Weston & Universal appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.