Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) vs Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR)
LW leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$45.70Consumer Defensive
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
$37.94Consumer Defensive
Total return — LW vs TR
growth of $100 · last 10yLW +34.4%TR +47.3%TR compounded faster
LW TR
LW vs TR: by the numbers
- •LW is the larger company ($6.31B vs $2.85B market cap).
- •LW trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.36 vs 27.90 P/E).
- •TR converts more revenue to profit (13.55% vs 4.61% net margin).
- •LW grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.30% vs 9.35% CAGR).
- •LW pays the higher dividend yield (3.28% vs 0.95%).
Which is better, LW or TR?
Metric tally: LW 9 · TR 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLW(lower P/E)
GrowthLW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLW(higher dividend yield)
QualityLW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LW | TR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.36● | 27.90 |
| Forward P/E | 15.66● | 27.00 |
| P/S ratio | 0.98● | 3.87 |
| P/B ratio | 3.48 | 3.00● |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.37● | 17.43 |
| FCF yield | 9.96%● | 3.47% |
Profitability
| Metric | LW | TR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 20.57% | 35.37%● |
| Operating margin | 9.33% | 14.14%● |
| Net margin | 4.61% | 13.55%● |
| ROE | 16.44%● | 10.50% |
| ROIC | 7.43%● | 6.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | LW | TR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.28%● | 0.95% |
| Payout ratio | 59.76% | 26.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LW | TR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.30%● | 9.35% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.93% | 11.64%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.92% | 11.48%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.90% | 6.89%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LW or TR?
- It depends on your goal. value: LW (lower P/E); growth: LW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LW (higher dividend yield); quality: LW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LW leads 9 to 7.
- Is LW or TR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LW is cheaper: LW trades at a 21.36 P/E and TR at 27.90.
- Which has grown faster, LW or TR?
- Over the past five years, LW grew revenue faster — LW at a 12.30% CAGR versus TR at 9.35%.
- Does LW or TR pay a bigger dividend?
- LW yields 3.28% and TR yields 0.95% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LW or TR more profitable?
- TR runs the higher net margin — LW at 4.61% versus TR at 13.55%.
- Which has been the better investment, LW or TR?
- Over the past 5-year, TR delivered the higher annualized total return — LW at -8.90% versus TR at 4.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lamb Weston P/E ratioTootsie Roll Industries P/E ratioLamb Weston dividend yieldTootsie Roll Industries dividend yieldLamb Weston ROETootsie Roll Industries ROELamb Weston operating marginTootsie Roll Industries operating marginLamb Weston revenue growthTootsie Roll Industries revenue growthLamb Weston free cash flowTootsie Roll Industries free cash flow
Lamb Weston & Tootsie Roll Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.