Which has grown faster, LW or TAP?

Over the past five years, LW grew revenue faster — LW at a 12.30% CAGR versus TAP at 3.44%.

Does LW or TAP pay a bigger dividend?

LW yields 3.33% and TAP yields 4.82% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LW or TAP more profitable?

LW runs the higher net margin — LW at 4.61% versus TAP at -18.85%.

Which has been the better investment, LW or TAP?

Over the past 5-year, TAP delivered the higher annualized total return — LW at -8.68% versus TAP at -6.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) vs Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP)

TAP leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Molson Coors Beverage Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.

$6.22B

$45.06Consumer Defensive

TAP

Molson Coors Beverage Company

$7.39B

$39.40Consumer Defensive

Total return — LW vs TAP

growth of $100 · last 10y

LW +32.5%TAP -62.0%LW compounded faster

LW TAP

LW vs TAP: by the numbers

•TAP is the larger company ($7.39B vs $6.22B market cap).
•LW is profitable (4.61% net margin) while TAP runs a net loss (-18.85%).
•LW grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.30% vs 3.44% CAGR).
•TAP pays the higher dividend yield (4.82% vs 3.33%).

Which is better, LW or TAP?

Metric tally: LW 6 · TAP 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthLW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeTAP(higher dividend yield)

QualityLW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LW	TAP
P/E ratio	21.06	—
Forward P/E	15.44	7.95●
P/S ratio	0.96	0.67●
P/B ratio	3.44	0.74●
EV / EBITDA	10.28	—
FCF yield	10.10%	15.63%●

Profitability

Metric	LW	TAP
Gross margin	20.57%	37.83%●
Operating margin	9.33%●	-20.28%
Net margin	4.61%●	-18.85%
ROE	16.44%●	-20.98%
ROIC	7.43%●	-10.20%

Dividends

Metric	LW	TAP
Dividend yield	3.33%	4.82%●
Payout ratio	59.76%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LW	TAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.30%●	3.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.93%	36.85%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.92%●	1.73%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-8.68%	-3.14%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LW or TAP?: It depends on your goal. growth: LW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TAP (higher dividend yield); quality: LW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TAP leads 8 to 6.
Which has grown faster, LW or TAP?: Over the past five years, LW grew revenue faster — LW at a 12.30% CAGR versus TAP at 3.44%.
Does LW or TAP pay a bigger dividend?: LW yields 3.33% and TAP yields 4.82% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LW or TAP more profitable?: LW runs the higher net margin — LW at 4.61% versus TAP at -18.85%.
Which has been the better investment, LW or TAP?: Over the past 5-year, TAP delivered the higher annualized total return — LW at -8.68% versus TAP at -6.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LW analysis Full TAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lamb Weston P/E ratio Molson Coors Beverage P/E ratio Lamb Weston dividend yield Molson Coors Beverage dividend yield Lamb Weston ROE Molson Coors Beverage ROE Lamb Weston operating margin Molson Coors Beverage operating margin Lamb Weston revenue growth Molson Coors Beverage revenue growth Lamb Weston free cash flow Molson Coors Beverage free cash flow

Lamb Weston & Molson Coors Beverage appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.