Which has grown faster, LW or TAP?

Over the past five years, LW grew revenue faster — LW at a 12.49% CAGR versus TAP at 2.31%.

Does LW or TAP pay a bigger dividend?

LW yields 3.16% and TAP yields 4.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LW or TAP more profitable?

LW runs the higher net margin — LW at 4.39% versus TAP at -20.81%.

How have LW and TAP total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, LW delivered -2.69% and TAP delivered -0.46% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) vs Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP)

A side-by-side comparison of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Molson Coors Beverage Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.

$6.39B

$46.46Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 17, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TAP

Molson Coors Beverage Company

$7.33B

$39.08Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 17, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LW vs TAP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LW +65.4% (+5.2%/yr)TAP -51.8% (-7.0%/yr)LW compounded faster over this window

LW TAP

LW vs TAP: by the numbers

•TAP is the larger company ($7.33B vs $6.39B market cap).
•LW is profitable (4.39% net margin) while TAP runs a net loss (-20.81%).
•LW grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 2.31% CAGR).
•TAP pays the higher dividend yield (4.91% vs 3.16%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LW	TAP
P/E ratio	22.34	N/A
Forward P/E	15.37	8.28
P/S ratio	0.97	0.66
P/B ratio	3.50	0.72
EV / EBITDA	10.49	N/A
FCF yield	N/A	18.09%

Profitability

Metric	LW	TAP
Gross margin	20.56%	36.22%
Operating margin	8.94%	-22.74%
Net margin	4.39%	-20.81%
ROE	15.89%	-22.79%
ROIC	6.54%	-11.90%

Dividends

Metric	LW	TAP
Dividend yield	3.16%	4.91%
Payout ratio	72.60%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LW	TAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.49%	2.31%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	10.92%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.64%	-0.97%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.69%	-0.46%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, LW or TAP?: Over the past five years, LW grew revenue faster — LW at a 12.49% CAGR versus TAP at 2.31%.
Does LW or TAP pay a bigger dividend?: LW yields 3.16% and TAP yields 4.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LW or TAP more profitable?: LW runs the higher net margin — LW at 4.39% versus TAP at -20.81%.
How have LW and TAP total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, LW delivered -2.69% and TAP delivered -0.46% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LW analysis Full TAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lamb Weston P/E ratio Lamb Weston dividend yield Molson Coors Beverage dividend yield Lamb Weston ROE Molson Coors Beverage ROE Lamb Weston operating margin Molson Coors Beverage operating margin Lamb Weston revenue growth Molson Coors Beverage revenue growth Lamb Weston free cash flow Molson Coors Beverage free cash flow

Lamb Weston & Molson Coors Beverage appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.