Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM)
LVS leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Las Vegas Sands Corp. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
$47.12Consumer Cyclical
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
$239.19Consumer Cyclical
Total return — LVS vs WSM
growth of $100 · last 22yLVS +1.2%WSM +1201.4%WSM compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LVS WSM
LVS vs WSM: by the numbers
- •LVS is the larger company ($31.22B vs $28.14B market cap).
- •LVS trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.45 vs 26.78 P/E).
- •WSM converts more revenue to profit (13.81% vs 13.41% net margin).
- •LVS grew revenue faster over the past five years (36.98% vs 1.55% CAGR).
- •LVS pays the higher dividend yield (2.55% vs 1.27%).
Which is better, LVS or WSM?
Metric tally: LVS 12 · WSM 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLVS(lower P/E)
GrowthLVS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLVS(higher dividend yield)
QualityWSM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LVS | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.45● | 26.78 |
| Forward P/E | 14.21● | 27.47 |
| P/S ratio | 2.30● | 3.64 |
| P/B ratio | 26.35 | 15.34● |
| PEG ratio | 1.44● | 42.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.93● | 16.24 |
| FCF yield | 7.34%● | 3.82% |
Profitability
| Metric | LVS | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.59%● | 46.06% |
| Operating margin | 24.64%● | 17.97% |
| Net margin | 13.41% | 13.81%● |
| ROE | 153.50%● | 58.22% |
| ROIC | 13.82% | 28.83%● |
Dividends
| Metric | LVS | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.55%● | 1.27% |
| Payout ratio | 51.06% | 33.93% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LVS | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 36.98%● | 1.55% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.42% | 15.25%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 27.95%● | -3.21% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.08% | 26.98%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LVS or WSM?
- It depends on your goal. value: LVS (lower P/E); growth: LVS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LVS (higher dividend yield); quality: WSM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LVS leads 12 to 5.
- Is LVS or WSM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LVS is cheaper: LVS trades at a 17.45 P/E and WSM at 26.78.
- Which has grown faster, LVS or WSM?
- Over the past five years, LVS grew revenue faster — LVS at a 36.98% CAGR versus WSM at 1.55%.
- Does LVS or WSM pay a bigger dividend?
- LVS yields 2.55% and WSM yields 1.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LVS or WSM more profitable?
- WSM runs the higher net margin — LVS at 13.41% versus WSM at 13.81%.
- Which has been the better investment, LVS or WSM?
- Over the past 10-year, WSM delivered the higher annualized total return — LVS at 3.33% versus WSM at 27.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Las Vegas Sands P/E ratioWilliams-Sonoma P/E ratioLas Vegas Sands dividend yieldWilliams-Sonoma dividend yieldLas Vegas Sands ROEWilliams-Sonoma ROELas Vegas Sands operating marginWilliams-Sonoma operating marginLas Vegas Sands revenue growthWilliams-Sonoma revenue growthLas Vegas Sands free cash flowWilliams-Sonoma free cash flow
Las Vegas Sands & Williams-Sonoma appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.