Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) vs Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA)
LVS leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though ULTA is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Las Vegas Sands Corp. and Ulta Beauty, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
$50.67Consumer Cyclical
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
$467.74Consumer Cyclical
Total return — LVS vs ULTA
growth of $100 · last 19yLVS -62.4%ULTA +1468.5%ULTA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LVS ULTA
LVS vs ULTA: by the numbers
- •LVS is the larger company ($33.58B vs $20.11B market cap).
- •ULTA trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.53 vs 18.77 P/E).
- •LVS converts more revenue to profit (13.41% vs 9.36% net margin).
- •LVS grew revenue faster over the past five years (36.98% vs 12.93% CAGR).
- •LVS pays a dividend (2.17% yield) while ULTA does not currently pay one.
Which is better, LVS or ULTA?
Metric tally: LVS 9 · ULTA 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueULTA(lower P/E)
GrowthLVS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityULTA(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | LVS | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.77 | 17.53● |
| Forward P/E | 15.28 | 14.65● |
| P/S ratio | 2.47 | 1.62● |
| P/B ratio | 28.33 | 7.97● |
| PEG ratio | 1.43● | 22.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.68● | 12.53 |
| FCF yield | 6.83%● | 5.10% |
Profitability
| Metric | LVS | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.59%● | 39.33% |
| Operating margin | 24.64%● | 12.54% |
| Net margin | 13.41%● | 9.36% |
| ROE | 153.50%● | 46.06% |
| ROIC | 13.82% | 22.76%● |
Dividends
| Metric | LVS | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.17% | — |
| Payout ratio | 46.81% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LVS | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 36.98%● | 12.93% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.42% | 52.49%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 27.95%● | 0.55% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.72% | 6.68%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LVS or ULTA?
- It depends on your goal. value: ULTA (lower P/E); growth: LVS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ULTA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LVS leads 9 to 7.
- Is LVS or ULTA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ULTA is cheaper: LVS trades at a 18.77 P/E and ULTA at 17.53.
- Which has grown faster, LVS or ULTA?
- Over the past five years, LVS grew revenue faster — LVS at a 36.98% CAGR versus ULTA at 12.93%.
- Does LVS or ULTA pay a bigger dividend?
- LVS pays a dividend (2.17% yield) while ULTA does not currently pay one.
- Is LVS or ULTA more profitable?
- LVS runs the higher net margin — LVS at 13.41% versus ULTA at 9.36%.
- Which has been the better investment, LVS or ULTA?
- Over the past 10-year, ULTA delivered the higher annualized total return — LVS at 3.57% versus ULTA at 6.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Las Vegas Sands P/E ratioUlta Beauty P/E ratioLas Vegas Sands dividend yieldUlta Beauty dividend yieldLas Vegas Sands ROEUlta Beauty ROELas Vegas Sands operating marginUlta Beauty operating marginLas Vegas Sands revenue growthUlta Beauty revenue growthLas Vegas Sands free cash flowUlta Beauty free cash flow
Las Vegas Sands & Ulta Beauty appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.