Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) vs Tapestry, Inc. (TPR)
LVS leads on 14 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Las Vegas Sands Corp. and Tapestry, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
$47.76Consumer Cyclical
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
$150.53Consumer Cyclical
Total return — LVS vs TPR
growth of $100 · last 22yLVS +2.6%TPR +445.0%TPR compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LVS TPR
LVS vs TPR: by the numbers
- •LVS is the larger company ($31.65B vs $30.41B market cap).
- •LVS trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.69 vs 48.25 P/E).
- •LVS converts more revenue to profit (13.41% vs 8.44% net margin).
- •LVS grew revenue faster over the past five years (36.98% vs 10.13% CAGR).
- •LVS pays the higher dividend yield (2.30% vs 1.06%).
Which is better, LVS or TPR?
Metric tally: LVS 14 · TPR 2It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLVS(lower P/E)
GrowthLVS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLVS(higher dividend yield)
QualityLVS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LVS | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.69● | 48.25 |
| Forward P/E | 14.40● | 21.58 |
| P/S ratio | 2.33● | 3.99 |
| P/B ratio | 26.71● | 45.95 |
| PEG ratio | 1.44 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.28● | 30.72 |
| FCF yield | 7.24%● | 5.60% |
Profitability
| Metric | LVS | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.59% | 76.18%● |
| Operating margin | 24.64%● | 11.32% |
| Net margin | 13.41%● | 8.44% |
| ROE | 153.50%● | 97.13% |
| ROIC | 13.82%● | 6.59% |
Dividends
| Metric | LVS | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.30%● | 1.06% |
| Payout ratio | 46.81% | 188.24% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LVS | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 36.98%● | 10.13% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.42%● | -14.80% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 27.95%● | 16.89% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.08% | 32.10%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LVS or TPR?
- It depends on your goal. value: LVS (lower P/E); growth: LVS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LVS (higher dividend yield); quality: LVS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LVS leads 14 to 2.
- Is LVS or TPR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LVS is cheaper: LVS trades at a 17.69 P/E and TPR at 48.25.
- Which has grown faster, LVS or TPR?
- Over the past five years, LVS grew revenue faster — LVS at a 36.98% CAGR versus TPR at 10.13%.
- Does LVS or TPR pay a bigger dividend?
- LVS yields 2.30% and TPR yields 1.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LVS or TPR more profitable?
- LVS runs the higher net margin — LVS at 13.41% versus TPR at 8.44%.
- Which has been the better investment, LVS or TPR?
- Over the past 10-year, TPR delivered the higher annualized total return — LVS at 2.82% versus TPR at 17.21%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Las Vegas Sands P/E ratioTapestry P/E ratioLas Vegas Sands dividend yieldTapestry dividend yieldLas Vegas Sands ROETapestry ROELas Vegas Sands operating marginTapestry operating marginLas Vegas Sands revenue growthTapestry revenue growthLas Vegas Sands free cash flowTapestry free cash flow
Las Vegas Sands & Tapestry appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.