Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs Tractor Supply Company (TSCO)
A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Tractor Supply Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
$118.64Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 11:39 AM EDT
TSCO
Tractor Supply Company
$30.51Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 11:40 AM EDT
Total return — LULU vs TSCO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 19yLULU +753.4%TSCO +1389.1%TSCO compounded faster
LULU TSCO
LULU vs TSCO: by the numbers
- •TSCO is the larger company ($16.00B vs $13.47B market cap).
- •LULU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.67 vs 15.73 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 6.42% net margin).
- •LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 5.80% CAGR).
- •TSCO pays a dividend (3.11% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LULU | TSCO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.67 | 15.73 |
| Forward P/E | 9.16 | 15.54 |
| P/S ratio | 1.23 | 1.01 |
| P/B ratio | 2.86 | 6.02 |
| PEG ratio | 0.40 | 25.45 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.64 | 11.58 |
| FCF yield | 9.28% | 1.94% |
Profitability
| Metric | LULU | TSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.70% | 32.47% |
| Operating margin | 18.21% | 8.91% |
| Net margin | 13.03% | 6.42% |
| ROE | 30.25% | 38.45% |
| ROIC | 22.70% | 13.11% |
Dividends
| Metric | LULU | TSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.11% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 45.41% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LULU | TSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.61% | 5.80% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.02% | 14.09% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.88% | -17.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -21.48% | -1.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LULU or TSCO?
- LULU has the lower trailing P/E: LULU trades at 9.67 and TSCO at 15.73. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LULU or TSCO?
- Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus TSCO at 5.80%.
- Does LULU or TSCO pay a bigger dividend?
- TSCO pays a dividend (3.11% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is LULU or TSCO more profitable?
- LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus TSCO at 6.42%.
- How have LULU and TSCO total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, LULU delivered 4.40% and TSCO delivered 6.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lululemon Athletica P/E ratioTractor Supply P/E ratioLululemon Athletica dividend yieldTractor Supply dividend yieldLululemon Athletica ROETractor Supply ROELululemon Athletica operating marginTractor Supply operating marginLululemon Athletica revenue growthTractor Supply revenue growthLululemon Athletica free cash flowTractor Supply free cash flow
Lululemon Athletica & Tractor Supply appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.