Is LULU or TSCO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: LULU trades at a 9.62 P/E and TSCO at 15.32.

Which has grown faster, LULU or TSCO?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus TSCO at 6.44%.

Does LULU or TSCO pay a bigger dividend?

TSCO pays a dividend (3.01% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Is LULU or TSCO more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus TSCO at 6.91%.

Which has been the better investment, LULU or TSCO?

Over the past 10-year, TSCO delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.12% versus TSCO at 7.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs Tractor Supply Company (TSCO)

LULU leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Tractor Supply Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.21B

$118.77Consumer Cyclical

TSCO

Tractor Supply Company

$16.33B

$31.25Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LULU vs TSCO

growth of $100 · last 19y

LULU +732.7%TSCO +1247.9%TSCO compounded faster

LULU TSCO

LULU vs TSCO: by the numbers

•TSCO is the larger company ($16.33B vs $13.21B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.62 vs 15.32 P/E).
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 6.91% net margin).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 6.44% CAGR).
•TSCO pays a dividend (3.01% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, LULU or TSCO?

Metric tally: LULU 13 · TSCO 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLULU(lower P/E)

GrowthLULU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLULU(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LULU	TSCO
P/E ratio	9.62●	15.32
Forward P/E	10.76●	13.57
P/S ratio	1.22	1.05●
P/B ratio	2.84●	6.57
PEG ratio	0.40●	25.47
EV / EBITDA	5.81●	11.62
FCF yield	9.33%●	3.35%

Profitability

Metric	LULU	TSCO
Gross margin	55.70%●	32.46%
Operating margin	18.21%●	9.28%
Net margin	13.03%●	6.91%
ROE	30.25%	43.01%●
ROIC	22.70%●	13.11%

Dividends

Metric	LULU	TSCO
Dividend yield	—	3.01%
Payout ratio	—	45.41%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	TSCO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%●	6.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%●	14.09%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.36%●	-13.18%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-19.04%	-1.10%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LULU or TSCO?: It depends on your goal. value: LULU (lower P/E); growth: LULU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 13 to 3.
Is LULU or TSCO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: LULU trades at a 9.62 P/E and TSCO at 15.32.
Which has grown faster, LULU or TSCO?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus TSCO at 6.44%.
Does LULU or TSCO pay a bigger dividend?: TSCO pays a dividend (3.01% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
Is LULU or TSCO more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus TSCO at 6.91%.
Which has been the better investment, LULU or TSCO?: Over the past 10-year, TSCO delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.12% versus TSCO at 7.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full TSCO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Tractor Supply P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Tractor Supply dividend yield Lululemon Athletica ROE Tractor Supply ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin Tractor Supply operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Tractor Supply revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow Tractor Supply free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & Tractor Supply appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.