Which has grown faster, LULU or STLA?

Over the past five years, STLA grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus STLA at 20.41%.

Does LULU or STLA pay a bigger dividend?

STLA pays a dividend (14.29% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Is LULU or STLA more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus STLA at 1.62%.

Which has been the better investment, LULU or STLA?

Over the past 10-year, STLA delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 4.01% versus STLA at 5.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs Stellantis N.V. (STLA)

LULU leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Stellantis N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.23B

$116.51Consumer Cyclical

STLA

Stellantis N.V.

$15.44B

$5.33Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LULU vs STLA

growth of $100 · last 19y

LULU +711.6%STLA -32.3%LULU compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LULU STLA

LULU vs STLA: by the numbers

•STLA is the larger company ($15.44B vs $13.23B market cap).
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 1.62% net margin).
•STLA grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.41% vs 17.61% CAGR).
•STLA pays a dividend (14.29% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, LULU or STLA?

Metric tally: LULU 7 · STLA 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSTLA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLULU(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LULU	STLA
P/E ratio	9.20	—
Forward P/E	8.71	7.65●
P/S ratio	1.17	0.06●
P/B ratio	2.72	0.22●
PEG ratio	0.38	—
EV / EBITDA	5.37	2.55●
FCF yield	9.76%	—

Profitability

Metric	LULU	STLA
Gross margin	55.70%●	-1.38%
Operating margin	18.21%●	-14.48%
Net margin	13.03%●	1.62%
ROE	30.25%●	5.83%
ROIC	22.70%●	-14.30%

Dividends

Metric	LULU	STLA
Dividend yield	—	14.29%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	STLA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%	20.41%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%●	-0.16%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.36%●	-46.87%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.18%	-17.29%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LULU or STLA?: It depends on your goal. growth: STLA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 7 to 6.
Which has grown faster, LULU or STLA?: Over the past five years, STLA grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus STLA at 20.41%.
Does LULU or STLA pay a bigger dividend?: STLA pays a dividend (14.29% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
Is LULU or STLA more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus STLA at 1.62%.
Which has been the better investment, LULU or STLA?: Over the past 10-year, STLA delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 4.01% versus STLA at 5.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full STLA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Stellantis P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Stellantis dividend yield Lululemon Athletica ROE Stellantis ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin Stellantis operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Stellantis revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow Stellantis free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & Stellantis appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.