Which has grown faster, LULU or NIO?

Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus NIO at 33.07%.

Is LULU or NIO more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus NIO at -8.84%.

Which has been the better investment, LULU or NIO?

Over the past 5-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.35% versus NIO at -35.21%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs NIO Inc. (NIO)

LULU leads on 7 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and NIO Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.49B

$118.77Consumer Cyclical

NIO

NIO Inc.

$12.28B

$5.21Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LULU vs NIO

growth of $100 · last 8y

LULU -22.4%NIO -21.1%NIO compounded faster

LULU NIO

LULU vs NIO: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($13.49B vs $12.28B market cap).
•LULU is profitable (13.03% net margin) while NIO runs a net loss (-8.84%).
•NIO grew revenue faster over the past five years (33.07% vs 17.61% CAGR).

Which is better, LULU or NIO?

Metric tally: LULU 7 · NIO 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthNIO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLULU(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	LULU	NIO
P/E ratio	9.62	—
Forward P/E	10.67	8.59●
P/S ratio	1.22	0.90●
P/B ratio	2.84●	20.55
PEG ratio	0.40	—
EV / EBITDA	5.81	—
FCF yield	9.33%	—

Profitability

Metric	LULU	NIO
Gross margin	55.70%●	15.74%
Operating margin	18.21%●	-8.06%
Net margin	13.03%●	-8.84%
ROE	30.25%●	-200.85%
ROIC	22.70%●	-26.94%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	NIO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%	33.07%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.36%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-18.88%●	-35.21%

Frequently asked

Which is better, LULU or NIO?: It depends on your goal. growth: NIO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 7 to 3.
Which has grown faster, LULU or NIO?: Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus NIO at 33.07%.
Is LULU or NIO more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus NIO at -8.84%.
Which has been the better investment, LULU or NIO?: Over the past 5-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.35% versus NIO at -35.21%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full NIO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio NIO P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica dividend yield NIO dividend yield Lululemon Athletica ROE NIO ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin NIO operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth NIO revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow NIO free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & NIO appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.