Which has grown faster, LULU or NIO?

Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus NIO at 33.07%.

Is LULU or NIO more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus NIO at -8.84%.

How have LULU and NIO total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, LULU delivered 4.51% and NIO delivered -35.48% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs NIO Inc. (NIO)

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and NIO Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.55B

$119.31Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 3:40 PM EDT

NIO

NIO Inc.

$11.85B

$4.78Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 3:40 PM EDT

Total return — LULU vs NIO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

LULU -21.9%NIO -29.1%LULU compounded faster

LULU NIO

LULU vs NIO: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($13.55B vs $11.85B market cap).
•LULU is profitable (13.03% net margin) while NIO runs a net loss (-8.84%).
•NIO grew revenue faster over the past five years (33.07% vs 17.61% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LULU	NIO
P/E ratio	9.74	N/A
Forward P/E	9.22	N/A
P/S ratio	1.24	0.81
P/B ratio	2.88	18.46
PEG ratio	0.41	N/A
EV / EBITDA	5.68	N/A
FCF yield	9.21%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	LULU	NIO
Gross margin	55.70%	15.74%
Operating margin	18.21%	-16.89%
Net margin	13.03%	-8.84%
ROE	30.25%	-200.85%
ROIC	22.70%	-26.94%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	NIO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%	33.07%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-1.88%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.09%	-35.48%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, LULU or NIO?: Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus NIO at 33.07%.
Is LULU or NIO more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus NIO at -8.84%.
How have LULU and NIO total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, LULU delivered 4.51% and NIO delivered -35.48% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full NIO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio NIO P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica dividend yield NIO dividend yield Lululemon Athletica ROE NIO ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin NIO operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth NIO revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow NIO free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & NIO appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.