Which has the lower trailing P/E, LULU or NA?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: LULU trades at 9.54 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LULU or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Is LULU or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus NA at 505.49%.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: LULU is classified in Consumer Cyclical; NA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.66B

$120.32Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LULU vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

LULU -59.4%NA -98.4%LULU compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LULU NA

LULU vs NA: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($13.66B vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 9.54 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 13.03% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 17.61% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LULU	NA
P/E ratio	9.54	2.30
Forward P/E	9.03	N/A
P/S ratio	1.21	11.40
P/B ratio	2.82	0.41
PEG ratio	0.40	N/A
EV / EBITDA	5.56	6.44
FCF yield	9.41%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	LULU	NA
Gross margin	55.70%	-147.33%
Operating margin	18.21%	-396.84%
Net margin	13.03%	505.49%
ROE	30.25%	17.96%
ROIC	22.70%	-10.96%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%	64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-1.88%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.06%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LULU or NA?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: LULU trades at 9.54 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LULU or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Is LULU or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield Lululemon Athletica ROE Nano Labs ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin Nano Labs operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.