Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA)
A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Murphy USA Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 9, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
$99.72Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 9, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
$517.46Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 9, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — LULU vs MUSA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yLULU +51.2% (+4.2%/yr)MUSA +628.6% (+22.0%/yr)MUSA compounded faster over this window
LULU MUSA
LULU vs MUSA: by the numbers
- •LULU is the larger company ($11.32B vs $9.56B market cap).
- •LULU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.48 vs 15.77 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •LULU converts more revenue to profit (12.78% vs 2.87% net margin).
- •LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.96% vs 9.42% CAGR).
- •MUSA pays a dividend (0.49% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LULU | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.48 | 15.77 |
| Forward P/E | 7.91 | 14.83 |
| P/S ratio | 1.05 | 0.45 |
| P/B ratio | 2.39 | 12.27 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.24 | 9.88 |
| FCF yield | 10.74% | 5.64% |
Profitability
| Metric | LULU | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 56.11% | 7.26% |
| Operating margin | 17.76% | 4.38% |
| Net margin | 12.78% | 2.87% |
| ROE | 29.14% | 78.86% |
| ROIC | 19.69% | 17.90% |
Dividends
| Metric | LULU | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.49% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 7.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LULU | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.96% | 9.42% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.02% | 12.97% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.88% | 16.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -22.99% | 27.77% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LULU or MUSA?
- LULU has the lower trailing P/E: LULU trades at 8.48 and MUSA at 15.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LULU or MUSA?
- Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — LULU at a 14.96% CAGR versus MUSA at 9.42%.
- Does LULU or MUSA pay a bigger dividend?
- MUSA pays a dividend (0.49% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is LULU or MUSA more profitable?
- LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 12.78% versus MUSA at 2.87%.
- How have LULU and MUSA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, LULU delivered 4.56% and MUSA delivered 21.78% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lululemon Athletica P/E ratioMurphy USA P/E ratioMurphy USA dividend yieldLululemon Athletica ROEMurphy USA ROELululemon Athletica operating marginMurphy USA operating marginLululemon Athletica revenue growthMurphy USA revenue growthLululemon Athletica free cash flowMurphy USA free cash flow
Lululemon Athletica & Murphy USA appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 9, 2026.