Is LULU or MGM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: LULU trades at a 8.54 P/E and MGM at 64.68.

Which has grown faster, LULU or MGM?

Over the past five years, MGM grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus MGM at 31.54%.

Is LULU or MGM more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus MGM at 1.03%.

Which has been the better investment, LULU or MGM?

Over the past 10-year, MGM delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 3.98% versus MGM at 7.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs MGM Resorts International (MGM)

LULU leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and MGM Resorts International across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$11.97B

$105.43Consumer Cyclical

MGM

MGM Resorts International

$11.91B

$46.57Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LULU vs MGM

growth of $100 · last 19y

LULU +653.1%MGM -35.3%LULU compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LULU MGM

LULU vs MGM: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($11.97B vs $11.91B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.54 vs 64.68 P/E).
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 1.03% net margin).
•MGM grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.54% vs 17.61% CAGR).

Which is better, LULU or MGM?

Metric tally: LULU 10 · MGM 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLULU(lower P/E)

GrowthMGM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLULU(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LULU	MGM
P/E ratio	8.54●	64.68
Forward P/E	9.59●	27.37
P/S ratio	1.09	0.68●
P/B ratio	2.52●	4.95
PEG ratio	0.36	—
EV / EBITDA	4.92●	24.55
FCF yield	10.52%	14.37%●

Profitability

Metric	LULU	MGM
Gross margin	55.70%●	44.16%
Operating margin	18.21%●	5.18%
Net margin	13.03%●	1.03%
ROE	30.25%●	7.51%
ROIC	22.70%●	2.65%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	MGM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%	31.54%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%●	-23.69%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.36%	30.01%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.74%	1.95%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LULU or MGM?: It depends on your goal. value: LULU (lower P/E); growth: MGM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 10 to 5.
Is LULU or MGM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: LULU trades at a 8.54 P/E and MGM at 64.68.
Which has grown faster, LULU or MGM?: Over the past five years, MGM grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus MGM at 31.54%.
Is LULU or MGM more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus MGM at 1.03%.
Which has been the better investment, LULU or MGM?: Over the past 10-year, MGM delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 3.98% versus MGM at 7.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full MGM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio MGM Resorts International P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica dividend yield MGM Resorts International dividend yield Lululemon Athletica ROE MGM Resorts International ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin MGM Resorts International operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth MGM Resorts International revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow MGM Resorts International free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & MGM Resorts International appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.