Which has the lower trailing P/E, LULU or MGM?

LULU has the lower trailing P/E: LULU trades at 9.67 and MGM at 26.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LULU or MGM?

Over the past five years, MGM grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus MGM at 22.64%.

Is LULU or MGM more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus MGM at 2.40%.

How have LULU and MGM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LULU delivered 4.01% and MGM delivered 6.61% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs MGM Resorts International (MGM)

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and MGM Resorts International across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.56B

$119.45Consumer CyclicalAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

MGM

MGM Resorts International

$10.87B

$43.22Consumer CyclicalAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — LULU vs MGM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LULU +48.9% (+4.1%/yr)MGM +87.0% (+6.5%/yr)MGM compounded faster over this window

LULU MGM

LULU vs MGM: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($13.56B vs $10.87B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.67 vs 26.19 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 2.40% net margin).
•MGM grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.64% vs 17.61% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LULU	MGM
P/E ratio	9.67	26.19
Forward P/E	9.15	23.17
P/S ratio	1.23	0.63
P/B ratio	2.86	4.43
EV / EBITDA	5.64	18.28
FCF yield	9.28%	15.02%

Profitability

Metric	LULU	MGM
Gross margin	55.70%	44.16%
Operating margin	18.21%	5.73%
Net margin	13.03%	2.40%
ROE	30.25%	16.96%
ROIC	21.31%	2.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	MGM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%	22.64%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-1.88%	27.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.34%	2.80%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LULU or MGM?: LULU has the lower trailing P/E: LULU trades at 9.67 and MGM at 26.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LULU or MGM?: Over the past five years, MGM grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus MGM at 22.64%.
Is LULU or MGM more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus MGM at 2.40%.
How have LULU and MGM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LULU delivered 4.01% and MGM delivered 6.61% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full MGM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio MGM Resorts International P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica ROE MGM Resorts International ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin MGM Resorts International operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth MGM Resorts International revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow MGM Resorts International free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & MGM Resorts International appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.