Which has the lower trailing P/E, LULU or LYFT?

LYFT has the lower trailing P/E: LULU trades at 8.13 and LYFT at 2.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LULU or LYFT?

Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — LULU at a 14.96% CAGR versus LYFT at 22.62%.

Is LULU or LYFT more profitable?

LYFT runs the higher net margin — LULU at 12.78% versus LYFT at 42.32%.

How have LULU and LYFT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, LULU delivered -25.62% and LYFT delivered -21.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs Lyft, Inc. (LYFT)

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Lyft, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: LULU is classified in Consumer Cyclical; LYFT is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$11.24B

$98.97Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LYFT

Lyft, Inc.

$5.82B

$15.32TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LULU vs LYFT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

LULU -32.5% (-5.5%/yr)LYFT -80.8% (-21.0%/yr)LULU compounded faster over this window

LULU LYFT

LULU vs LYFT: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($11.24B vs $5.82B market cap).
•LYFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.23 vs 8.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LYFT converts more revenue to profit (42.32% vs 12.78% net margin).
•LYFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.62% vs 14.96% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LULU	LYFT
P/E ratio	8.13	2.23
Forward P/E	10.05	26.61
P/S ratio	1.01	0.86
P/B ratio	2.31	1.92
EV / EBITDA	N/A	92.45
FCF yield	N/A	19.69%

Profitability

Metric	LULU	LYFT
Gross margin	56.11%	45.52%
Operating margin	17.76%	-1.77%
Net margin	12.78%	42.32%
ROE	29.14%	94.78%
ROIC	19.69%	-2.83%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	LYFT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.96%	22.62%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-1.88%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-25.62%	-21.38%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LULU or LYFT?: LYFT has the lower trailing P/E: LULU trades at 8.13 and LYFT at 2.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LULU or LYFT?: Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — LULU at a 14.96% CAGR versus LYFT at 22.62%.
Is LULU or LYFT more profitable?: LYFT runs the higher net margin — LULU at 12.78% versus LYFT at 42.32%.
How have LULU and LYFT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, LULU delivered -25.62% and LYFT delivered -21.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full LYFT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Lyft P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica ROE Lyft ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin Lyft operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Lyft revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow Lyft free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & Lyft appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.